Jane Doe v. CRST Expedited, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: JANE DOE
Defendant: CRST Expedited, Inc., Arthur Martyn and DOES 1 through 20
Case Number: 2:2021cv05362
Filed: July 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error, the Notice Re Intra District Transfer to Eastern Division was inadvertently omitted. Case has been assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Sheri Pym. New Case Number 5:21-cv-01117-JGB (SPx). See Notice of Intra District Transfer attached as Attachment 1. Case Number 2:21-cv-05362 is terminated. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Intra District Transfer) (jtil)
July 1, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe in Riverside Superior Court on 5/14/2021, attached as Exhibit 1. (jtil)
July 1, 2021 NON CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendants CRST Expedited, Inc., Arthur Martyn, attached as Exhibit 2. (jtil)
July 1, 2021 Filing 5 DECLARATION of Angela Stastny re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant CRST Expedited, Inc.. (Nesbit, Kristen)
July 1, 2021 Filing 4 DECLARATION of Kristen J. Nesbit re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant CRST Expedited, Inc.. (Nesbit, Kristen)
July 1, 2021 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant CRST Expedited, Inc., identifying none. (Nesbit, Kristen)
July 1, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant CRST Expedited, Inc.. (Nesbit, Kristen)
July 1, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside County Superior Court, case number CVRI2102214 Receipt No: ACACDC-31565068 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant CRST Expedited, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Answer) (Attorney Kristen Jeannine Nesbit added to party CRST Expedited, Inc.(pty:dft))(Nesbit, Kristen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jane Doe v. CRST Expedited, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CRST Expedited, Inc.
Represented By: Kristen Jeannine Nesbit
Represented By: LaLonnie Villa Gray
Represented By: Nathan Vern Okelberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arthur Martyn
Represented By: John C Taylor
Represented By: Natalie Weatherford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 20
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JANE DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?