Daisy Hoch v. Walmart et al
Plaintiff: Daisy Hoch
Defendant: Walmart Inc., Walmart, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Does 1-100, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv05366
Filed: July 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael R Wilner
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2021 Filing 11 Receipt of documents remanded to Superior Court for the State of California. (vm)
July 12, 2021 Filing 10 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Superior Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Superior Court for the State of California, County of Los Angeles. (vm)
July 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Effective immediately, the matter herein shall be removed to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles. Remanding case to Case Terminated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (vm)
July 9, 2021 Filing 8 Joint STIPULATION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Defendant Walmart. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Joint Stipulation to Remand Action to State Court)(Valdes, Macy)
July 6, 2021 Filing 7 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (vm)
July 2, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Notice to Counsel (CV-20a) Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program - optional form #4 is missing attachment CV11-C form. Corrected Notice has been issued see item 5. Docket item 4 should be disregarded. (car)
July 2, 2021 Filing 5 CORRECTED NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (car)
July 2, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (car)
July 1, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-100, inclusive, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Walmart, filed by Plaintiff Daisy Hoch. Filed in State Court on 12/30/2020 Submitted with Attachment 3 to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
July 1, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Plaintiff Walmart. Filed in State Court on 4/2/2021 Submitted with Attachment 8 to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
July 1, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Walmart Inc., identifying Walmart Inc.. (Valdes, Macy)
July 1, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Valdes, Macy)
July 1, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 20AVCV00911 Receipt No: ACACDC-31565893 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Macy Valdes, Esq. in Support of Defendant Walmart Inc.'s Notice of Removal of Action Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332 and 1441(b) [DIVERSITY], #2 Notice of Lodgment of State Court File, #3 Complaint, #4 Summons, #5 Civil Case Cover Sheet, #6 Notice of Case Assignment, #7 Proof of Service of Summons, #8 Defendant Walmart Inc.'s Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint) (Attorney Macy Valdes added to party Walmart Inc.(pty:dft))(Valdes, Macy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daisy Hoch v. Walmart et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daisy Hoch
Represented By: Gerald L Marcus
Represented By: Thomas Vincent Consolo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart Inc.
Represented By: Macy Valdes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart
Represented By: Andrew O Smith
Represented By: Macy Valdes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?