Shalondous Heard v. Skanska-Traylor-Shea, a Joint Venture
Shalondous Heard |
Skanska-Traylor-Shea, a joint venture and Does 1-50, inclusive |
2:2021cv05419 |
July 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Rozella A Oliver |
Stephen V Wilson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court. (mrgo) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 19 REPLY Reply is in Support of Motion to Remand First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #16 PLAINTIFFS REPLY TO DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT filed by Plaintiff Shalondous Heard. (Koulloukian, Nazo) |
Filing 18 ANSWER to Amended Complaint #15 filed by Defendant Skanska-Traylor-Shea, a Joint Venture.(Rankin, Amy) |
Filing 17 Opposition Opposition re: First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #16 filed by Defendant Skanska-Traylor-Shea, a Joint Venture. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Amy Rankin in Support of Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Remand Case to State Court)(Rankin, Amy) |
Filing 16 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Shalondous Heard. Motion set for hearing on 8/30/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF NAZO KOULLOUKIAN IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT, #2 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER) (Koulloukian, Nazo) |
Filing 15 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Skanska-Traylor-Shea, a Joint Venture amending Complaint - (Discovery),, filed by plaintiff Shalondous Heard. (mrgo) |
![]() |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF LODGING filed TO CORRECT THE [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT re Stipulation to Amend/Correct, #12 , Complaint - (Discovery), (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT)(Koulloukian, Nazo) |
Filing 12 First STIPULATION to AMEND Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Shalondous Heard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT 1 - First Amended Complaint for Violation of the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004, Cal. Labor Code 2698 et seq., #2 Declaration DECLARATION OF NAZO KOULLOUKIAN IN SUPPORT OF STIPULATION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, #3 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT)(Koulloukian, Nazo) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Skanska-Traylor-Shea, a Joint Venture.(Rankin, Amy) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Skanska-Traylor-Shea, a Joint Venture, re Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 , Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 , Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #9 , Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #7 , Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #8 served on July 8, 2021. (Rankin, Amy) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (lh) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff Shalondous Heard, upon Defendant Skanska-Traylor-Shea, a Joint Venture served on 6/3/2021, answer due 6/24/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Juliet Swan, Receptionist in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 6/9/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF Class Action COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Skanska-Traylor-Shea, a Joint Venture. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Shalondous Heard. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/20/2020 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Skanska-Traylor-Shea, a joint venture, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on July 2, 2021. (Rankin, Amy) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant All Defendants, identifying Skanska USA Civil West California District, Inc., Traylor Bros, Inc., J.F. Shea Construction. (Rankin, Amy) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Skanska-Traylor-Shea, a joint venture. (Rankin, Amy) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV18812 Receipt No: ACACDC-31574043 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Skanska-Traylor-Shea, a joint venture. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Amy Rankin in Support of Notice of Removal, #2 Declaration Declaration of Michael Richardson in Support of Notice of Removal) (Attorney Amy Rankin added to party Skanska-Traylor-Shea, a joint venture(pty:dft))(Rankin, Amy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.