Emily Rios v. Guaranteed Rate Affinity, LLC
Defendant: Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Petitioner: GUARANTEED RATE AFFINITY, LLC and EMILY RIOS
Case Number: 2:2021cv05429
Filed: July 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F Eick
Referring Judge: Fernando M Olguin
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE #7 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court hereby dismisses this action without prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
July 20, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Emily Rios. Dismissal is Without Prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Campbell, Jessica)
July 8, 2021 Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
July 6, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
July 6, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (lh)
July 6, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Guaranteed Rate Affinity, LLC. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Emily Rios. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 4/28/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
July 2, 2021 NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Guaranteed Rate Affinity, LLC. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh)
July 2, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant GUARANTEED RATE AFFINITY, LLC, (Skeen, Spencer)
July 2, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant GUARANTEED RATE AFFINITY, LLC. (Skeen, Spencer)
July 2, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21STCV16001 Receipt No: ACACDC-31575286 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant GUARANTEED RATE AFFINITY, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Table of Contents, #2 Exhibit 1 to Notice, #3 Exhibit 2 to Notice, #4 Exhibit 3 to Notice, #5 Exhibit 4 to Notice, #6 Declaration of Matelski, #7 Exhibit Table of Contents, #8 Exhibit 1 to Declaration, #9 Exhibit 2 to Declaration, #10 Declaration of Spencer Skeen, #11 Declaration of Nikolaos Anthansiou) (Attorney Spencer C Skeen added to party GUARANTEED RATE AFFINITY, LLC(pty:bkmov))(Skeen, Spencer)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Emily Rios v. Guaranteed Rate Affinity, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: GUARANTEED RATE AFFINITY, LLC
Represented By: Spencer C Skeen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: EMILY RIOS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?