Nicole Guttormsen v. SharkNinja Operating LLC
Nicole Guttormsen |
SharkNinja Operating LLC |
2:2021cv05458 |
July 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC (Kaiser, Scott) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC.(Kaiser, Scott) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Scott Donald Kaiser on behalf of Defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC (Attorney Scott Donald Kaiser added to party SharkNinja Operating LLC(pty:dft))(Kaiser, Scott) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nicole Guttormsen, upon Defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC served on 8/10/2021, answer due 8/31/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Zuromski, Richard) |
Filing 8 Plaintiff Nicole Guttormsen's NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nicole Guttormsen, (Zuromski, Richard) |
Filing 7 INITIAL ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (vmun) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa) |
Filing 5 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC. (esa) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (esa) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Nicole Guttormsen. (Zuromski, Richard) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nicole Guttormsen. (Zuromski, Richard) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31579706 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Nicole Guttormsen. (Attorney Richard John Zuromski, Jr added to party Nicole Guttormsen(pty:pla))(Zuromski, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Nicole Guttormsen v. SharkNinja Operating LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nicole Guttormsen | |
Represented By: | Richard John Zuromski, Jr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SharkNinja Operating LLC | |
Represented By: | Scott Donald Kaiser |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.