Nicole Guttormsen v. SharkNinja Operating LLC
Plaintiff: Nicole Guttormsen
Defendant: SharkNinja Operating LLC
Case Number: 2:2021cv05458
Filed: July 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F Eick
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2021 Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC (Kaiser, Scott)
August 31, 2021 Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC.(Kaiser, Scott)
August 31, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Scott Donald Kaiser on behalf of Defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC (Attorney Scott Donald Kaiser added to party SharkNinja Operating LLC(pty:dft))(Kaiser, Scott)
August 11, 2021 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nicole Guttormsen, upon Defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC served on 8/10/2021, answer due 8/31/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Zuromski, Richard)
July 6, 2021 Filing 8 Plaintiff Nicole Guttormsen's NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nicole Guttormsen, (Zuromski, Richard)
July 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (vmun)
July 6, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa)
July 6, 2021 Filing 5 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant SharkNinja Operating LLC. (esa)
July 6, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (esa)
July 6, 2021 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Nicole Guttormsen. (Zuromski, Richard)
July 6, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nicole Guttormsen. (Zuromski, Richard)
July 6, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31579706 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Nicole Guttormsen. (Attorney Richard John Zuromski, Jr added to party Nicole Guttormsen(pty:pla))(Zuromski, Richard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nicole Guttormsen v. SharkNinja Operating LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Guttormsen
Represented By: Richard John Zuromski, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SharkNinja Operating LLC
Represented By: Scott Donald Kaiser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?