Michael Adams v. Bank of America, National Association
Michael Adams |
Bank of America, National Association |
2:2021cv05521 |
July 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Ronald SW Lew |
Fernando M Olguin |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Consumer Credit |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transfer from Southern District of California, 3:21-cv-01327 filed 7/22/2021. (iv) |
Filing 11 Conditional Transfer Order - 3 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2992, transferring case to USDC, Southern District of California and assigned to Honorable Larry Alan Burns. Case transferred electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv) |
Filing 10 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 9 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Ronald S.W. Lew to Judge Fernando M. Olguin for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-05521 FMO(JPRx). (rn) |
Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Bank of America, National Association. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties (Bontrager, Nicholas) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Michael Adams. (Bontrager, Nicholas) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Michael Adams. (Bontrager, Nicholas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31591265 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Nicholas J Bontrager added to party Michael Adams(pty:pla))(Bontrager, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Michael Adams v. Bank of America, National Association | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael Adams | |
Represented By: | George Thomas Martin, III |
Represented By: | Nicholas J Bontrager |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Bank of America, National Association | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.