Gregory D. Hayes v. United States of America et al
| Gregory D. Hayes |
| United States of America, Director Carvajal, Warden Birkholz, Administrator L. Cross, Investigator Sia Gonzalez, CO Barajas, Bruce Mackenzie, Steven Wolf, Michael Alexandra and Does 1-10 Federal Bureau of Prisons employees and prisoners, individually and in their official and compensatory capacities |
| 2:2021cv05527 |
| July 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| Otis D Wright |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER RE: CIVIL RIGHTS CASE by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams for pre-trial proceedings. All future pleadings shall be addressed to Christianna Howard, Clerk to Magistrate Judge Abrams, United States Courthouse, 255 E. Temple Street, Los Angeles, California 90012. Plaintiff is advised that the Court is presently screening the complaint in this action. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (ch)
|
| Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT to Complaint #1 ; Document No. 7 Response filed by Plaintiff Gregory D. Hayes. (ch) |
| Filing 9 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS)' by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams: The Court has reviewed plaintiffs Motion Requesting Interpretation and Direction of Law (ECF No. #8 ), in which he asks for guidance concerning the protection and confidentiality of certain unnamed inmates whom plaintiff indicates would assist his case but for safety concerns. Plaintiff's Motion is denied. [See document for details.] Plaintiff is reminded that, as previously ordered, his failure to complete and submit sections A (previous lawsuits) and B (exhaustion of administrative remedies) of the form Complaint, and sign the Complaint form at page 6 and return all documents to the Court by August 26, 2021, will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and follow court orders. (es) |
| Filing 8 MOTION REQUESTING INTERPRETATION AND DIRECTION OF LAW FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS OF WITNESS IDENTITIES filed by plaintiff Gregory D. Hayes. (es) |
| Filing 7 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams: In the Court s July 9, 2021, Order Denying Plaintiff's Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees, plaintiff was instructed to complete sections A (previous lawsuits) and B (exhaustion of administrative remedies) of the form Complaint, and then sign the Complaint form at page 6 and return all documents to the Court for consideration. To date, he has not done so. Plaintiff is advised that his failure to submit these documents by August 26, 2021, will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and follow court orders. (es) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams: Granting #5 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. Re REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support #5 . It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $10.00 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (es)
|
| Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Gregory D. Hayes. (ch) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND WITHIN 30 DAYS #2 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) Modified on 7/9/2021 (lc).
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (esa) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by plaintiff Gregory D. Hayes. (Attachments: #1 lodged proposed order) (esa) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendantsMichael Alexandra(BOP Prisoner, in his individual capacity), Michael Alexandra(BOP Prisoner, in his official capacity), Barajas, Barajas, Birkholz(Warden Federal Bureau of Priscons, FCI, in his official capacity), Birkholz(Warden Federal Bureau of Priscons, FCI, in his individual capacity), Carvajal(Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, in his individual capacity), Carvajal(Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, in his official capacity), L. Cross(BOP Health Care Administrator, in his individual capacity), L. Cross(BOP Health Care Administrator, in his official capacity), Does, Sia Gonzalez(BOP Investigator, in his individual capacity), Sia Gonzalez(BOP Investigator, in his official capacity), Bruce Mackenzie(BOP Prisoner, in his individual capacity), Bruce Mackenzie(BOP Prisoner, in his official capacity), United States of America, Steven Wolf(BOP Prisoner, in his official capacity), Steven Wolf(BOP Prisoner, in his individual capacity) pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams, filed by plaintiff Gregory D. Hayes. (Attachments: #1 attachment 1, #2 attachment 2, #3 attachment 3, #4 summons req BOP, #5 summons req Wolf, #6 summons req Gonzalez, #7 summons req Cross, #8 summons req Birkholz, #9 summons req Barajas, #10 summons req MacKenzie, #11 summons req AG, #12 summons req AG, #13 summons req USA, #14 CV 71) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
