The Cincinnati Reds, LLC v. Anthony Esquer
| The Cincinnati Reds, LLC |
| Anthony Esquer |
| 2:2021cv05568 |
| July 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff The Cincinnati Reds, LLC. Dismissal is Without Prejudice. (Peterson, Timothy) |
| Filing 11 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vdr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff The Cincinnati Reds, LLC, upon Defendant Anthony Esquer served on 7/13/2021, answer due 8/3/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Defendant Anthony Esquer in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Peterson, Timothy) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Anthony Esquer. (esa) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (esa) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action or Proceeding filed by Plaintiff THE CINCINNATI REDS, LLC. (Peterson, Timothy) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff THE CINCINNATI REDS, LLC, (Peterson, Timothy) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff THE CINCINNATI REDS, LLC. (Peterson, Timothy) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff THE CINCINNATI REDS, LLC. (Peterson, Timothy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31603628 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff THE CINCINNATI REDS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Complaint) (Attorney Timothy A Peterson added to party THE CINCINNATI REDS, LLC(pty:pla))(Peterson, Timothy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Cincinnati Reds, LLC v. Anthony Esquer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Cincinnati Reds, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Timothy A Peterson |
| Represented By: | Casey Kenobi |
| Represented By: | Jerome M Jackson |
| Represented By: | Casey William Kenobi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Anthony Esquer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
