Brian Vasquez v. City of Baldwin Park et al
| Brian Vasquez |
| City of Baldwin Park, Officer Alex Asencio, #4430, Officer Eric Camacho. #4415, Officer Alex Asencio, Officer Eric Camacho and Does 1-25, inclusive |
| DOES 1-25, inclusive, |
| 2:2021cv05588 |
| July 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
TEXT ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING DEFENDANT CITY OF BALDWIN PARK'S MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER SUBMISSION (DKT. #10 ) by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The Court finds that Defendant City of Baldwin Park's Motion to Dismiss (DKT. #10 ) currently scheduled for hearing on September 3, 2021, at 1:30 PM, is appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. L.R. 7-15. Accordingly, this motion is taken UNDER SUBMISSION and the hearing is vacated. No appearances are necessary THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf)
|
| Filing 12 REPLY NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Fourth Claim and Sixth Claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) #10 REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION filed by Defendant City of Baldwin Park. (Dunkel, Yaron) |
| Filing 11 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Fourth Claim and Sixth Claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) #10 filed by Plaintiff Brian Vasquez. (Ryu, Thomas) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Fourth Claim and Sixth Claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant City of Baldwin Park. Motion set for hearing on 9/3/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Declaration OF YARON F DUNKEL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT BALDWIN PARKS MOTION TO DISMISS, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Proposed Order RE DEFENDANT CITY OF BALDWIN PARKS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT) (Dunkel, Yaron) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to City of Baldwin Park answer now due 7/30/2021, filed by Defendant City of Baldwin Park.(Dunkel, Yaron) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (vv)
|
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Alex Asencio, Eric Camacho, City of Baldwin Park, Does, filed by plaintiff Brian Vasquez. (filed in state court 10/20/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTY OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT filed by Defendant City of Baldwin Park. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Removal)(Dunkel, Yaron) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant City of Baldwin Park, (Dunkel, Yaron) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant City of Baldwin Park. (Dunkel, Yaron) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 20STCV40292 Receipt No: ACACDC-31606218 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant City of Baldwin Park. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Complaint) (Attorney Yaron F Dunkel added to party City of Baldwin Park(pty:dft))(Dunkel, Yaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
