Anthony Echevarria v. City of Santa Monica et al
Anthony Echevarria |
City of Santa Monica, Ivan Martin, Officer Rodriguez and Cynthia Renaud |
2:2021cv05603 |
July 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Stephen V Wilson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 10/25/2021 at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants City of Santa Monica, Cynthia Renaud, (McNicholl, Steven) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Answer of Defendants to Complaint filed by Defendants City of Santa Monica, Cynthia Renaud.(McNicholl, Steven) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Rodriguez answer now due 8/30/2021; Ivan Martin answer now due 8/30/2021; City of Santa Monica answer now due 8/30/2021; Cynthia Renaud answer now due 8/30/2021, filed by Defendants Rodriguez; Ivan Martin; City of Santa Monica; Cynthia Renaud.(Attorney Steven McNicholl added to party City of Santa Monica(pty:dft), Attorney Steven McNicholl added to party Ivan Martin(pty:dft), Attorney Steven McNicholl added to party Cynthia Renaud(pty:dft), Attorney Steven McNicholl added to party Rodriguez(pty:dft))(McNicholl, Steven) |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendants City of Santa Monica, Ivan Martin, Cynthia Renaud, Rodriguez. (mrgo) |
Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Summons Request #8 filed by Anthony Echevarria Anthony Echevarria. (Carlin, Gary) |
Filing 9 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Anthony Echevarria Anthony Echevarria, identifying City of Santa Monica; Ivan Martin; Officer Rodriguez; Cynthia Renaud. (Carlin, Gary) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Anthony Echevarria Anthony Echevarria. (Carlin, Gary) |
Filing 7 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa) |
Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (esa) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (esa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31608500 - Fee: $402, filed by Anthony Echevarria Anthony Echevarria. (Attachments: #1 summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Gary R Carlin added to party Anthony Echevarria(pty:pla))(Carlin, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.