Victor Zamora v. Verizon Wireless Services, LLC et al
| Victor Zamora |
| Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, Does 1-10, inclusive, Trans Union, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC |
| 2:2021cv05622 |
| July 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Victor Zamora, upon Defendant Verizon Wireless Services, LLC served on 9/1/2021, answer due 9/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jessie Gastelum, person authorized to accept service of process on behalf of Registered Agent CT Corporation in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Rahimi, F) |
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Victor Zamora, upon Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 9/1/2021, answer due 9/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jessie Gastelum, person authorized to accept service of process on behalf of Registered Agent CT Corporation in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Rahimi, F) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Victor Zamora, upon Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC served on 9/1/2021, answer due 9/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Trudy Desbiens, person authorized to accept service of process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Rahimi, F) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Victor Zamora, upon Defendant Trans Union, LLC served on 9/1/2021, answer due 9/22/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Trudy Desbiens, person authorized to accept service of process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Rahimi, F) |
| Filing 13 Summons Returned Unexecuted filed by Plaintiff Victor Zamora. as to Equifax Information Services, LLC., Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Summons Issued #12 , Amended Complaint/Petition #11 filed by Plaintiff Victor Zamora., PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Victor Zamora, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Trudy Desbiens, person authorized to accept service of process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Rahimi, F) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint #11 as to Defendants Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Trans Union, LLC, Verizon Wireless Services, LLC. (jp) |
| Filing 11 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Victor Zamora (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Rahimi, F) |
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (dd)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Verizon Wireless Services, LLC. (jp) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Victor Zamora. (Rahimi, F) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Victor Zamora, (Rahimi, F) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (et) |
| Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31613000 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Victor Zamora. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Attorney F Jay Rahimi added to party Victor Zamora(pty:pla))(Rahimi, F) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
