7020 Van Nuys Blvd LLC v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
7020 Van Nuys Blvd LLC |
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Nationwide Insurance Company and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
2:2021cv05657 |
July 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer that Plaintiff take nothing, the action be dismissed with prejudice, and Defendants recover costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 USC 1920. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp) |
Filing 18 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer GRANTING Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #12 ). See Order for specifics. (jp) |
Filing 17 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING MOTION OFF CALENDAR AND UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Court, on its own motion, takes the Motion #12 set for Monday, September 13, 2021 off calendar and under submission. The Court will set a new hearing date if it decides oral argument would be helpful. A written order will follow. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 16 REPLY in support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State a Claim #12 filed by Defendants Nationwide Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. (Martin, Sonia) |
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State a Claim #12 filed by Plaintiff 7020 Van Nuys Blvd LLC. (Younessi, Ramin) |
Filing 14 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 9/20/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi) |
Filing 13 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State a Claim #12 filed by Defendants Nationwide Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D, #2 Exhibit E-H, #3 Exhibit I-M)(Martin, Sonia) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case For Failure to State a Claim filed by defendants Nationwide Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. Motion set for hearing on 9/13/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (Martin, Sonia) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, identifying Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. (Martin, Sonia) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The document is accepted as filed. Counsel is ordered to file a Notice of Interested Parties (CV-30) by 7/22/2021. (dd) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (dd) |
Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendants Nationwide Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 And All Supporting and Subsequent Documents served on July 14, 2021. (Martin, Sonia) |
Filing 7 NOTICE To Plaintiff Of Removal filed by defendants Nationwide Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. (Martin, Sonia) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendants Nationwide Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company identifying Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company as Corporate Parent. (Martin, Sonia) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa) |
Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (esa) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (esa) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 21STCV17327 Receipt No: ACACDC-31621371 - Fee: $402, filed by defendants Nationwide Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Sonia Renee Martin added to party Nationwide Insurance Company(pty:dft), Attorney Sonia Renee Martin added to party Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company(pty:dft))(Martin, Sonia) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Nationwide Insurance Company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff 7020 Van Nuys Blvd LLC. (filed in state court 5/7/21, submitted as document 1, attachment 1, p. 8) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.