ARMANDO GONZALEZ v. KAHTY BARAN et al
ARMANDO GONZALEZ |
KATHY A. BARAN, ANTONY BLINKEN, MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, CHRISTOPHER WRAY, RICHARD C. VISEK, IAN G. BROWNLEE and MARK WELLS |
2:2021cv05902 |
July 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
Christina A Snyder |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. § 1329 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff ARMANDO GONZALEZ, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to TRACY WILKISON U.S. ATTORNEY. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to MERRICK GARLAND U.S Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to CHRISTOPHER WRAY Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation Office of General Counsel. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. CHRISTOPHER WRAY Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation Office of General Counsel (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff ARMANDO GONZALEZ, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to TRACY WILKISON U.S. ATTORNEY. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to MERRICK GARLAND U.S Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to MARK WELLS The Executive Office, Office of the Legal Adviser. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. MARK WELLS The Executive Office, Office of the Legal Adviser (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff ARMANDO GONZALEZ, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to TRACY WILKISON U.S. ATTORNEY. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to MERRICK GARLAND U.S Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to RICHARD C. VISEK The Executive Office, Office of the Legal Adviser. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. RICHARD C. VISEK The Executive Office, Office of the Legal Adviser (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff ARMANDO GONZALEZ, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to TRACY WILKISON U.S. ATTORNEY. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to MERRICK GARLAND U.S Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS Secretary, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS Secretary, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff ARMANDO GONZALEZ, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to TRACY WILKISON U.S. ATTORNEY. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to MERRICK GARLAND U.S Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to MERRICK GARLAND Attorney General of the United States. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. MERRICK GARLAND Attorney General of the United States (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff ARMANDO GONZALEZ, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to TRACY WILKISON U.S. ATTORNEY. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to MERRICK GARLAND U.S Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to IAN G. BROWNLEE The Executive Office, Office of the Legal Adviser. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. IAN G. BROWNLEE The Executive Office, Office of the Legal Adviser (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff ARMANDO GONZALEZ, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to TRACY WILKISON U.S. ATTORNEY. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to MERRICK GARLAND U.S Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to ANTONY BLINKEN The Executive Office, Office of the Legal Adviser. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. ANTONY BLINKEN The Executive Office, Office of the Legal Adviser (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff ARMANDO GONZALEZ, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to TRACY WILKISON U.S. ATTORNEY. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to MERRICK GARLAND U.S Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to KATHY A. BARAN Director of California Service Center, and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. KATHY A. BARAN Director of California Service Center, and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff ARMANDO GONZALEZ, upon Defendant KATHY A. BARAN served on 8/2/2021, answer due 10/1/2021; ANTONY BLINKEN served on 8/3/2021, answer due 10/4/2021; IAN G. BROWNLEE served on 8/3/2021, answer due 10/4/2021; MERRICK GARLAND served on 8/3/2021, answer due 10/4/2021; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS served on 8/3/2021, answer due 10/4/2021; RICHARD C. VISEK served on 8/3/2021, answer due 10/4/2021; MARK WELLS served on 8/3/2021, answer due 10/4/2021; CHRISTOPHER WRAY served on 8/3/2021, answer due 10/4/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to TRACY WILKISON U.S. ATTORNEY. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to MERRICK GARLAND U.S Attorney General. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to KATHY A. BARAN Director of California Service Center, and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, ANTONY BLINKEN Secretary of the U.S. Department of State, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS Secretary, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, CHRISTOPHER WRAY Director Federal Bureau of Investigation, RICHARD C. VISEK Acting Legal Adviser, U.S. Dept. of State, IAN G. BROWNLEE Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Consular Affairs, MARK WELLS Deputy Chief of Mission, U.S. Embassy in Colombia.. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit and Delivery report, #2 Affidavit Affidavit and Delivery report, #3 Affidavit Affidavit and Delivery report, #4 Affidavit Affidavit and Delivery report, #5 Affidavit Affidavit and Delivery report, #6 Affidavit Affidavit and Delivery report, #7 Affidavit Affidavit and Delivery report, #8 Affidavit Affidavit and Delivery report)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTIFF ARMANDO GONZALEZ, served on 08/02/2021. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Christina A. Snyder. (rba) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants KATHY A. BARAN, ANTONY BLINKEN, IAN G. BROWNLEE, MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, RICHARD C. VISEK, MARK WELLS, CHRISTOPHER WRAY. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (jtil) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Petition (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff ARMANDO GONZALEZ. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff ARMANDO GONZALEZ, (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ARMANDO GONZALEZ. (Goldstein, Joshua) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus Receipt No: ACACDC-31668835 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff ARMANDO GONZALEZ. (Attorney Joshua L Goldstein added to party ARMANDO GONZALEZ(pty:pla))(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.