David White v. Ventura County Credit Union et al
Plaintiff: David White
Defendant: Ventura County Credit Union and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv05960
Filed: July 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dale S Fischer
Referring Judge: Gail J Standish
Nature of Suit: Banks and Banking
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Emily J. Kirk to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff David White (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31774020) #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.3(b) Proposed order not attached. (lt)
August 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer granting #12 Non-Resident Attorney Emily J Kirk APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff David White, designating David C Wright as local counsel. (jp)
August 9, 2021 Filing 12 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Emily J. Kirk to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff David White (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-31774020) filed by Plaintiff David White. (Wright, David)
July 28, 2021 Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Emily J. Kirk on behalf of Plaintiff David White. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. I have not received updated Certificates of Good Standing from the State Bars in which I am admitted. Although I have requested these be processed expedited, I have yet to receive the certificates. Application will be filed as soon as these are received by my office. (lt)
July 23, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Emily J. Kirk. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh)
July 23, 2021 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Ventura County Credit Union. (lh)
July 23, 2021 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
July 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
July 23, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
July 23, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (lh)
July 22, 2021 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff David White. (Wright, David)
July 22, 2021 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff David White. (Wright, David)
July 22, 2021 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff David White, identifying David White; Ventura County Credit Union. (Wright, David)
July 22, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31680178 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff David White. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - VCCU Opt In Courtesy Pay, #2 Exhibit B - VCCU Opt In Form, #3 Exhibit C - Model A-9 Form (Ventura)) (Attorney David C. Wright added to party David White(pty:pla))(Wright, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David White v. Ventura County Credit Union et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David White
Represented By: David C. Wright
Represented By: Richard D. McCune
Represented By: Emily J. Kirk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ventura County Credit Union
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?