Michael McDuffie v. Life Insurance Company of North America
| MICHAEL McDUFFIE |
| LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA |
| 2:2021cv05962 |
| July 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Steve Kim |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 10/25/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Life Insurance Company of North America, identifying Life Insurance Company of North America ("LINA"); New York Life Insurance Company. (Blohm, Nicole) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Life Insurance Company of North America.(Ingram, Grant) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Life Insurance Company of North America answer now due 9/17/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Life Insurance Company of North America.(Attorney Grant E Ingram added to party Life Insurance Company of North America(pty:dft))(Ingram, Grant) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Michael McDuffie, upon Defendant Life Insurance Company of North America served on 7/29/2021, answer due 8/19/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Diana Ruiz, Intake Specialist of C.T. Corporation - Agent for Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Bather, Phillip) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Life Insurance Company of North America. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL McDUFFIE. (Bather, Phillip) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL McDUFFIE. (Bather, Phillip) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL McDUFFIE, (Bather, Phillip) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31680698 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff MICHAEL McDUFFIE. (Attorney Phillip S Bather added to party MICHAEL McDUFFIE(pty:pla))(Bather, Phillip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
