Bryan Hunt v. City of Los Angeles et al
| Bryan Hunt |
| COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, City of Los Angeles and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv06059 |
| July 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
IN CHAMBERS ORDER TAKING MOTION UNDER ADVISEMENT by Judge Percy Anderson. A hearing on the MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION #14 is scheduled for September 20, 2021, at 1:30 p.m. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. The hearing calendared for September 20, 2021, is vacated and the matter taken off calendar. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kss) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 19
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson re: #14 MOTION for Reconsideration re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration re Status Conference - optional html form, Set/Clear Flags, Terminated Case, #12 #14 . For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction to consider the County's Motion for Reconsideration and that even if it could consider the Motion, the County has failed to satisfy its burden to establish that reconsideration is warranted. The simple fact remains that the County's Notice of Removal was procedurally defective and that Plaintiff did not waive that procedural defective and instead sought to have the action remanded to Los Angeles Superior Court. The Court committed no error in remanding the action to Los Angeles Superior Court. The Court therefore denies the County's Motion for Reconsideration and this action remains pending in Los Angeles Superior Court. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 17 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration re Status Conference - optional html form,,,, Set/Clear Flags,,,, Terminated Case,,, #12 #14 filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Declaration of Jeffery E. Stockley)(Stockley, Jeffery) |
| Filing 16 opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration re Status Conference - optional html form,,,, Set/Clear Flags,,,, Terminated Case,,, #12 #14 filed by Plaintiff Bryan Hunt. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Attorney Charles M. Ray)(Ray, Charles) |
| Filing 15 Receipt of Letter of Transmittal from Los Angeles Superior Court. Acknowledged by Paul Cruz on 8/6/2021. (et) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration re Status Conference - optional html form,,,, Set/Clear Flags,,,, Terminated Case,,, #12 filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles. Motion set for hearing on 9/20/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Percy Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Wayne H. Song In Support of Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration, #2 Declaration Declaration of Jeffery E. Stockley In Support of Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order on Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration on Court's Order Remanding Matter to State Court) (Stockley, Jeffery) |
| Filing 13 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court. (mrgo) |
| Filing 12 MINUTES OF STATUS CONFERENCE held via ZOOM before Judge Percy Anderson. The Notice of Removal is procedurally defective here because the City has not consented or joined in the Notice of Removal. Moreover, the Notice of Removal did not include a sufficient explanation for the absence of a joinder by the City, or any reason why the City's joinder was not necessary. The Court therefore concludes that the County's Notice of Removal is procedurally defective. At the hearing held on August 2, 2021, counsel for plaintiff Bryan Hunt declined to waive the procedural defect. Accordingly, this action is remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. 21STCV23052. (See document for details) (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) Court Reporter: Myra Ponce (video). (mrgo) |
| Filing 11 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Percy Anderson Status Conference via ZOOM is set for 8/2/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Percy Anderson. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kss) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 10 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant County of Los Angeles, (Stockley, Jeffery) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bryan Hunt. (Ray, Charles) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: MISC - Other Miscellaneous Case #2 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): An incorrect event was selected for Document No. 2. The correct event is Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71). You are not required to take any action in response to this notice unless the Court so directs. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Defendants City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Does. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Bryan Hunt. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 6/18/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet Fee Exemption in accordance with statute, filed by Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES.(Stockley, Jeffery) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV23052 (Receipt No: ACACDC-31709717 - Fee: $402 paid on 7/28/2021) filed by Defendant COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. (Attorney Jeffery E Stockley added to party COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES(pty:dft))(Stockley, Jeffery) Modified on 7/28/2021 (lh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
