C. Finley v. Gavin Christopher Newsom et al
C. Finley |
Gavin Christopher Newsom, Steven Gordon, Kathleen K. Webb, Tamma Adamek, Ajay Gupta, Anita Gore, Barry Steinhardt, Robert Crockett, Sonia Huestis, Coleen Solomon, Rico Rubiono, Scott Greminger, Randy Vera, Jennifer Berry, Trina Washington, Bernard Soriano and 20 Unknown Named Defendants |
2:2021cv06070 |
July 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John A Kronstadt |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge John A. Kronstadt that the request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #5 is hereby DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon for the following reasons: (1) Legally and/or factually patently frivolous. See attached pages. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Filing 12 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (tj) |
Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Summons Request #6 filed by Plaintiff C. Finley. (Yagman, Stephen) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #5 , Miscellaneous Document #2 , Notice (Other) #4 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Incorrect events were selected for Documents No. 2, 4, and 5. The correct events are Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71), Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, and Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). You are not required to take any action in response to this notice unless the Court so directs. (lh) |
Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (lh) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Chrystal finley. (Yagman, Stephen) |
Filing 5 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by Plaintiff Chrystal finley re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Yagman, Stephen) Modified on 7/29/2021 (lh). |
Filing 4 NOTICE INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Plaintiff Chrystal finley. (Yagman, Stephen) |
Filing 3 NOTICE RELATED CASE filed by Plaintiff Chrystal finley. (Yagman, Stephen) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chrystal finley re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Yagman, Stephen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Chrystal finley. (Attorney Stephen Yagman added to party Chrystal finley(pty:pla))(Yagman, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.