Gustavo Carmona v. United Parcel Service Inc. et al
| Gustavo Carmona |
| United Parcel Service Inc. (Ohio), United Parcel Service and Does 1 through 100, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv06100 |
| July 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge James V. Selna for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Karen E. Scott. New Case Number 8:21-cv-01282 JVS (KESx). (lh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, Orange County, case number 30-2021-01207005-CU-WT-CJC Receipt No: ACACDC-31710607 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant United Parcel Service Inc. (Ohio). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration Declaration of Marina Santos, #3 Declaration Declaration of Thomas N. Cammack III, #4 Notice of Interested Parties, #5 Request for Judicial Notice, #6 Proof of Service) (Attorney Skylar Pascal added to party United Parcel Service Inc. (Ohio)(pty:dft))(Pascal, Skylar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
