Luis Larraburu v. American Merchandising Specialists, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Luis Larraburu
Defendant: American Merchandising Specialists, Inc., American Merchandising Specialists, Inc. a North Carolina corporation doing business as AMS Retail Solutions and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv06184
Filed: July 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Patricia Donahue
Referring Judge: R Gary Klausner
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 (IN CHAMBERS) NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES AND ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case #15 , calendared for hearing on September 27, 2021 has been taken under submission and off the motion calendar. No appearances by counsel are necessary. The court will review the matter without hearing any further arguments in person or on paper. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
September 13, 2021 Filing 17 REPLY to Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #15 filed by Plaintiff Luis Larraburu. (Spivak, David)
September 3, 2021 Filing 16 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #15 filed by Defendant American Merchandising Specialists, Inc.. (Antonyan, Armine)
August 27, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Luis Larraburu. Motion set for hearing on 9/27/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Gregory B. Wilbur in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447, #2 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff Luis Larraburu's Motion to Remand Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1447) (Spivak, David)
August 12, 2021 Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Luis Larraburu, (Spivak, David)
August 12, 2021 Filing 13 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Luis Larraburu.. (Spivak, David)
August 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/8/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 11/15/2021 at 9:00 am. (sw)
August 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
August 6, 2021 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant American Merchandising Specialists, Inc..(Antonyan, Armine)
August 6, 2021 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant American Merchandising Specialists, Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,,, #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Notice and Acknowledgment of Service (CV-21) Executed, Complaint - (Discovery), served on July 30, 2021. (Rofos, Efthalia)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-06184 RGK(PDx). (rn)
August 2, 2021 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
August 2, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
August 2, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (car)
July 30, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants American Merchandising Specialists, Inc., Does 1 through 50, inclusive. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Luis Larraburu. Filed in State Court on 7/30/2021 Submitted with Attachment 3 to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
July 30, 2021 NON-CONFORMED COPY OF NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Luis Larraburu, upon Defendant American Merchandising Specialists, Inc. acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 6/10/2021, answer due 7/1/2021. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Armine Antonyan, Counsel for Defendant. Submitted with Attachment 4 Exhibit B to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
July 30, 2021 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant American Merchandising Specialists, Inc. (Antonyan, Armine)
July 30, 2021 Filing 3 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant American Merchandising Specialists, Inc., (Antonyan, Armine)
July 30, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant American Merchandising Specialists, Inc.. (Antonyan, Armine)
July 30, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior COurt, case number 21STCV17704 Receipt No: ACACDC-31724345 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant American Merchandising Specialists, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Angela Fox in Support of Notice of Removal, #2 Declaration Declaration of Armine Antonyan in Support of Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A to Declaration of Armine Antonyan: State Court Summons, Civil Case Cover Sheet and Complaint, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B to Declaration of Armine Antonyan: Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt of Summons & Complaint, #5 Exhibit Exhibit C to Declaration of Armine Antonyan: Request and Order to Continue Status Conference Pending Mediation, #6 Exhibit Exhibit D to Declaration of Armine Antonyan: Notice of Entry of Judgment filed July 6, 2021, #7 Exhibit Exhibit E to Declaration of Armine Antonyan: Proof of Service of Summons, #8 Exhibit Exhibit F to Declaration of Armine Antonyan: State Court Docket) (Attorney Armine Antonyan added to party American Merchandising Specialists, Inc.(pty:dft))(Antonyan, Armine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Luis Larraburu v. American Merchandising Specialists, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Luis Larraburu
Represented By: David G Spivak
Represented By: Walter L Haines
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Merchandising Specialists, Inc.
Represented By: Armine Antonyan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Merchandising Specialists, Inc. a North Carolina corporation doing business as AMS Retail Solutions
Represented By: Efthalia S Rofos
Represented By: John L. Barber
Represented By: Armine Antonyan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?