E and E Co., Ltd. v. Nanshing America Inc. et al
E & E Co., Ltd. and E and E Co., Ltd. |
Nanshing America Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2021cv06194 |
July 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dale S Fischer |
John E McDermott |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 501 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDERby Judge Dale S. Fischer. The new deadline for the Defendant to answer or in the alternative to respond to the complaint shall be 10/21/2021 #19 . (jp) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Interested Parties Nanshing America Inc.. (Li, Bin) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Parties, filed by Defendant Nanshing America Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Bin Li added to party Nanshing America Inc.(pty:dft))(Li, Bin) |
Filing 18 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi) |
Filing 17 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:21-cv-06194 DSF(JEMx). (rn) |
Filing 16 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff E and E Co., Ltd.. (Ellison, Michael) |
Filing 15 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (vm) |
Filing 14 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: PROOF OF SERVICED AND STATUS REPORT by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. The Court reviewed Plaintiffs proof of service and status report. (Docket # 12,13.) The previous order is DISCHARGED with no further consequence. (vm) |
Filing 13 STATUS REPORT Re Service of Process filed by Plaintiff E and E Co., Ltd.. (Ellison, Michael) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff E and E Co., Ltd., upon Defendant Nanshing America Inc. served on 8/30/2021, answer due 9/20/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Carlos Linares, Supervisor, Nanshing America Inc., a California Corporation in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Ellison, Michael) |
Filing 11 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: STATUS REPORT ON SERVICE OF PROCESS IN CIVIL ACTION by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Plaintiff may discharge this order by filing a statement (not to exceed 3 pages) plus proof of service of process by or before September 10, 2021. (See Minute Order for further details) (vm) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Notice of Clerical Error (G-11), #8 . Document # 8 Due to clerical error. The docket clerk docketed in error with wrong filed dated of 8/11/2020 for the Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 9 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 8/2/2021, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 10] NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) Modified on 8/2/2021 (ghap). |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #6 . The docket clerk docketed in error the Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nanshing America Inc. (ghap) |
Filing 6 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 8/2/2021, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 8] Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) Modified on 8/2/2021 (ghap). |
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by E & E Co., Ltd.. (Ellison, Michael) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff E & E Co., Ltd., identifying E & E Co., Ltd.. (Ellison, Michael) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff E & E Co., Ltd.. (Ellison, Michael) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff E & E Co., Ltd.. (Ellison, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31725224 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff E & E Co., Ltd.. (Attorney Michael W Ellison added to party E & E Co., Ltd.(pty:pla))(Ellison, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.