Bagrat Goroyan v. BMW of North America, LLC et al
Bagrat Goroyan |
BMW of North America, LLC and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
2:2021cv06203 |
July 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sheri Pym |
Otis D Wright |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 MINUTES (In Chambers): Order DENYING AS MOOT Motion to Remand #16 and STRIKING Text Entry 21 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. See minute order for details. (lom) |
Filing 21 STRICKEN, see docket entry no. 22 - The hearing on the MOTION TO REMAND #16 , scheduled for October 4, 2021 at 1:30 P.M., is hereby VACATED and taken off calendar. No appearances are necessary. The matter stands submitted, and will be decided upon without oral argument. An order will issue.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY Modified on 9/28/2021 (lom). |
Filing 20 Evidentiary Objection to Declaration of Armine Markosyan ISO of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Opposition re: First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Stanley Mosk Courthouse #18 filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (Stefatos, Andrew) |
Filing 19 OPPOSITION to First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Stanley Mosk Courthouse #18 filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (Stefatos, Andrew) |
Filing 18 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Stanley Mosk Courthouse filed by Plaintiff Bagrat Goroyan. Motion set for hearing on 10/18/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Markosyan, Armine) |
Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Stanley Mosk Courthouse #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Missing LR 6.1 formal Notice of Motion TEXT PARAGRAPH re hearing date, time, Judge and courtroom, designated Courthouse and its Street Location information. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 16 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Stanley Mosk Courthouse filed by Plaintiff Bagrat Goroyan. Motion set for hearing on 10/4/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Markosyan, Armine) |
Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Stanley Mosk Courthouse #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Other error(s) with document(s): Missing LR 6.1 formal Notice of Motion TEXT re hearing date, time, Judge and courtroom, designated Courthouse and its Street Location information. As a result matter is Not set on Judge's Motion Calendar for hearing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 14 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Stanley Mosk Courthouse filed by Plaintiff Bagrat Goroyan. (Markosyan, Armine) |
Filing 13 ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for November 8, 2021 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (lc) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. The Court's Electronic Document Submission System (EDSS) allows people without lawyers who have pending cases in the United States District Court for the Central District of California to submit documents electronically to the Clerk's Office The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. Please refer to Court's Website and Judge's procedures for information as applicable. (lc) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Rozella A Oliver to Judge Otis D. Wright, II for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:21-cv-06203 ODW (SPx). (esa) |
Filing 10 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Stefatos, Andrew) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Jury Demand #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on August 5, 2021. (Stefatos, Andrew) |
Filing 8 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (dml) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Notice to Counsel Re: Consent to Proceed before a US Magistrate Judge - optional html form #5 . Document # 5 Due to clerical error. The docket clerk docketed in error the Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 5 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 8/2/2021, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 6] Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/2/2021: #1 Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap). Modified on 8/2/2021 (ghap). |
NON CONFORM COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants BMW of North America, LLC, Does 1 through 50, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Bagrat Goroyan. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/24/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
Filing 4 Certificate and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC, identifying BMW (US) Holding Corp.. (Stefatos, Andrew) |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC.. (Stefatos, Andrew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (Stefatos, Andrew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV11405 Receipt No: ACACDC-31727001 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant BMW of North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C) (Attorney Andrew K Stefatos added to party BMW of North America, LLC(pty:dft))(Stefatos, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.