Shushanik Margarian v. Ted Baker Limited, Inc.
Shushanik Margarian |
Ted Baker Limited, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2021cv06228 |
August 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Stanley Blumenfeld |
Rozella A Oliver |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 MINUTES - IN CHAMBERS by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court strikes the two Applications for Pro Hac Vice #18 , #19 , without prejudice to refiling in accordance with the Court's standing order (provided that the refiling is otherwise timely), see Notice of Deficiency #20 . Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Edward J. Fanning to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Ted Baker Limited, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32061585) #18 , APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Benjamin D. Heller to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Ted Baker Limited, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32061727) #19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Other error(s) with document(s): Please note that electronic, image or stamp signatures are not allowed. (lt) |
Filing 19 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER CIVIL MINUTES OF 9/30/2021, SEE DOCKET NO. 21] APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Benjamin D. Heller to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Ted Baker Limited, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32061727) filed by Defendant Ted Baker Limited, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Nylen, Gregory) Modified on 9/30/2021 (gk). |
Filing 18 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER CIVIL MINUTES OF 9/30/2021, SEE DOCKET NO. 21] APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Edward J. Fanning to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Ted Baker Limited, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-32061585) filed by Defendant Ted Baker Limited, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Nylen, Gregory) Modified on 9/30/2021 (gk). |
|
Filing 16 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File OPPOSITION as to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Portions of Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 #13 filed by Plaintiff Shushanik Margarian. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS)(Margarian, Hovanes) |
Filing 15 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Portions of Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 #13 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #11 . The Court continues the hearing on both said motions from 10/01/2021 to 10/15/2021 at 08:30 AM for an in-person hearing before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. The hearing on said motions are continued because the date that was set had already been closed by the Court. Counsel is instructed top monitor the Court's closed motion dates on its webpage.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vcr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Portions of Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Ted Baker Limited, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 10/8/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Brief in Support of Defendant Ted Baker Limited, Inc.'s Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Nationwide Class Allegations, #2 Proposed Order Granting Defendant Ted Baker Limited, Inc.'s Motion to Strike) (Nylen, Gregory) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ted Baker Limited, Inc., identifying 1) Ted Baker Limited, Inc. and 2) No Ordinary Designer Label Limited. (Nylen, Gregory) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Ted Baker Limited, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 10/8/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Proposed Order Granting Defendant Ted Baker Limited, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss) (Attorney Gregory A Nylen added to party Ted Baker Limited, Inc.(pty:dft)) (Nylen, Gregory) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Shushanik Margarian, upon Defendant Ted Baker Limited, Inc. served on 8/12/2021, answer due 9/2/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Margarian, Hovanes) |
|
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Ted Baker Limited, Inc. (esa) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (esa) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Shushanik Margarian, (Margarian, Hovanes) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Shushanik Margarian. (Margarian, Hovanes) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Shushanik Margarian. (Margarian, Hovanes) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31732303 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff SHUSHANIK MARGARIAN. (Attorney Hovanes Margarian added to party SHUSHANIK MARGARIAN(pty:bkmov))(Margarian, Hovanes) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.