Gary Cheng v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. et al
| Gary Cheng |
| Activision Blizzard, Inc., Robert A. Kotick, Dennis Durkin and Spencer Neumann |
| 2:2021cv06240 |
| August 3, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| John E McDermott |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson re: Stipulation for Order #18 . The Court has before the parties Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint Pending Statutory Appointment of Lead Plaintiff. After reviewing the stipulation, the Court orders as follows: 1. Pursuant to the PSLRA, a lead plaintiff and lead counsel must be appointed by the Court. See 15 U.S.C. 78u-4(a)(3)(B). In this case, the deadline for filing a motion to be appointed lead plaintiff is October 4, 2021. Defendants Activision Blizzard, Inc., Robert A. Kotick, Dennis Durkin, and Spencer Newman ("Defendants") need not respond to the initial Complaint (ECF No. 1) filed in this action. (SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 19 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Alison Clare Jordan counsel for Defendants Activision Blizzard, Inc., Dennis Durkin, Robert A. Kotick. Adding Alison Jordan as counsel of record for Activision Blizzard, Inc., Robert A. Kotick, and Dennis Durkin for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Activision Blizzard Inc., Robert A. Kotick, Dennis Durkin. (Attorney Alison Clare Jordan added to party Activision Blizzard, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Alison Clare Jordan added to party Dennis Durkin(pty:dft), Attorney Alison Clare Jordan added to party Robert A. Kotick(pty:dft))(Jordan, Alison) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION for Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Defendants Activision Blizzard, Inc., Dennis Durkin, Robert A. Kotick. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Muck, Kevin) |
| Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Activision Blizzard, Inc. (Muck, Kevin) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Activision Blizzard, Inc., Dennis Durkin, Robert A. Kotick, (Muck, Kevin) |
| Filing 15 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Susan S Muck counsel for Defendants Activision Blizzard, Inc., Dennis Durkin, Robert A. Kotick. Adding Susan S. Muck as counsel of record for Activision Blizzard, Inc., Robert A. Kotick, and Dennis Durkin for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Activision Blizzard, Inc., Robert A. Kotick, and Dennis Durkin. (Attorney Susan S Muck added to party Activision Blizzard, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Susan S Muck added to party Dennis Durkin(pty:dft), Attorney Susan S Muck added to party Robert A. Kotick(pty:dft))(Muck, Susan) |
| Filing 14 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Kevin P Muck counsel for Defendants Activision Blizzard, Inc., Dennis Durkin, Robert A. Kotick. Adding Kevin P. Muck as counsel of record for Activision Blizzard, Inc., Robert A. Kotick, and Dennis Durkin for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Activision Blizzard, Inc., Robert A. Kotick, and Dennis Durkin. (Attorney Kevin P Muck added to party Activision Blizzard, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Kevin P Muck added to party Dennis Durkin(pty:dft), Attorney Kevin P Muck added to party Robert A. Kotick(pty:dft))(Muck, Kevin) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Gary Cheng. upon Dennis Durkin waiver sent by Plaintiff on 8/25/2021, answer due 10/25/2021. Waiver of Service signed by Kevin P. Muck. (Rosen, Laurence) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Gary Cheng. upon Robert A. Kotick waiver sent by Plaintiff on 8/25/2021, answer due 10/25/2021. Waiver of Service signed by Kevin P. Muck. (Rosen, Laurence) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Gary Cheng. upon Activision Blizzard, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 8/25/2021, answer due 10/25/2021. Waiver of Service signed by Kevin P. Muck. (Rosen, Laurence) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff Gary Cheng. upon Spencer Neumann waiver sent by Plaintiff on 8/25/2021, answer due 10/25/2021. Waiver of Service signed by Craig Varnen. (Rosen, Laurence) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Activision Blizzard, Inc., Dennis Durkin, Robert A. Kotick, Spencer Neumann. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Gary Cheng, (Rosen, Laurence) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Gary Cheng. (Rosen, Laurence) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Gary Cheng. (Rosen, Laurence) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31736431 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Gary Cheng. (Attorney Laurence M. Rosen added to party Gary Cheng(pty:pla))(Rosen, Laurence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
