Shizhe Shen et al v. Irene Martin et al
Shizhe Shen and Chaoran Yu |
Irene Martin, Tracy Renaud, Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick B. Garland |
2:2021cv06244 |
August 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alka Sagar |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. § 551 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiffs Shizhe Shen, Chaoran Yu. (Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiffs Shizhe Shen, Chaoran Yu, re Notice to Counsel (CV-20a) Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program - optional html form #5 served on 08/06/2021. (Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
Filing 14 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shizhe Shen, Chaoran Yu, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to F. De La Rosa. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Ely Asa. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed as to USA, #10 by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by no later than noon on August 20, 2021. Counsel is directed to file an AMENDED Proof of Service that cures the deficiency listed on docket no. 11. - Contact the Help Desk at (213) 894-0242 or ecf-helpdesk@cacd.uscourts.gov for assistance in in properly e-filing a proof of service. (et) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Title page is missing. Other error(s) with document(s): 1. See Local Rule 11-3.8 Title Page. 2. The docket entry is missing the date of service. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (hr) |
Filing 10 *STRICKEN DOCUMENT PER ORDER FILED ON 8/17/2021 SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. #12 * PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shizhe Shen, Chaoran Yu, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to F. De La Rosa. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. (Rozdzielski, Jennifer) Modified on 8/17/2021 (et). |
Filing 9 MINUTE (In Chambers) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar under the Civil Consent Pilot Project. The parties are reminded to review the time requirements for consent set forth in the Notice to Counsel that was issued at the time of the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff is instructed to forthwith serve a copy of this Order on all parties that have already been served with the summons and complaint, or to serve all parties with a copy of this Order at the time of service of the summons and complaint. (hr) |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Merrick B. Garland, Irene Martin, Alejandro Mayorkas, Tracy Renaud. (hr) |
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiffs Shizhe Shen, Chaoran Yu. (Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #4 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiffs Shizhe Shen, Chaoran Yu. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Shizhe Shen, Chaoran Yu. (Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: CCACDC-31737638 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiffs Shizhe Shen, Chaoran Yu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Jennifer Rozdzielski added to party Shizhe Shen(pty:pla), Attorney Jennifer Rozdzielski added to party Chaoran Yu(pty:pla))(Rozdzielski, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.