Clarence Leonard Hearns v. Kathleen Allison et al
Petitioner: Clarence Leonard Hearns
Respondent: Kathleen Allison and Xavier Becerra
Case Number: 2:2021cv06323
Filed: August 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jesus G Bernal
Referring Judge: Charles F Eick
2 Judge: John E McDermott
3 Judge: Virginia A Phillips
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2021 Filing 7 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 from Clarence Leonard Hearns. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #1 . Receipt number LA228322. (Lee, David)
September 22, 2021 Filing 8 RULE 50(a) MOTION filed by petitioner Clarence Leonard Hearns. (es)
September 10, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE filed by petitioner Clarence Leonard Hearns. (es)
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER SUMMARILY DISMISSING PETITION FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY #1 by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is dismissed without prejudice; and (2) a certificate of appealability is denied. [See document for details.] Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)
August 6, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error the Case has been reassigned from Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick to Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott for all further proceedings. The case will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-06323 VAP(JEM). (rn)
August 5, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111 and CV-60P) (ghap)
August 4, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by plaintiff Clarence Leonard Hearns. (ghap)
August 4, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Clarence Leonard Hearns. (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clarence Leonard Hearns v. Kathleen Allison et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Clarence Leonard Hearns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kathleen Allison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Xavier Becerra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?