Tibrea L. Cagle v. Amor L. Armour et al
Plaintiff: Tibrea L. Cagle
Defendant: Amor L. Armour, Maven Drive LLC, Maven Lsg, Ltd. LSR, GCar Titling Ltd and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv06382
Filed: August 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stanley Blumenfeld
Referring Judge: Rozella A Oliver
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2021 Filing 31 CORRECTED MINUTES - IN CHAMBERS #30 by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court strikes Plaintiff's proof of service #26 and Plaintiff's motion to remand #27 , without prejudice to refiling in accordance with the Court's standing order (provided that the refiling is otherwise timely), see Notice of Deficiencies #28 and #29 . Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
September 27, 2021 Filing 30 MINUTE IN CHAMBERS by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr: The Court strikes Plaintiffs proof of service., Dkt. No. #26 and Plaintiffs motion to remand, Dkt. No. 3274 without prejudice to refiling in accordance with the Court's standing order (provided that the refiling is otherwise timely), see Notice of Deficiencies, Dkt. Nos #28 and #29 . (jp)
September 27, 2021 Filing 29 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #27 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. The filer set this hearing for an untimely date of 10/1/2021 at 8:30 AM, Local Rule 6-1. Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk)
September 27, 2021 Filing 28 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (30 day), #26 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days). The filer used the event, Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (30 day), for docketing this filing. The 30-day event is to be used for Freedom of Information Act cases, only. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk)
September 24, 2021 Filing 27 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER CIVIL MINUTES OF 9/29/2021, SEE DOCKET NO. 31] First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Tibrea L. Cagle. Motion set for hearing on 10/1/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support Thereof, #2 Declaration Declaration of Irving Pedroza, In Support Thereof) (Pedroza, Irving) Modified on 9/29/2021 (gk).
September 24, 2021 Filing 26 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER CIVIL MINUTES OF 9/29/2021, SEE DOCKET NO. 31] SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Tibrea L. Cagle, upon Defendant Amor L. Armour served on 9/20/2021, answer due 10/20/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Pedroza, Irving) Modified on 9/29/2021 (gk).
September 24, 2021 Filing 25 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Tibrea L. Cagle re Order to Show Cause (Pedroza, Irving)
September 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing by not later than 9/28/2021 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The court will consider the filing of a Proof of service of summons and complaint as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause, on or before the above date. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the court's Order shall result in the dismissal of the action. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
September 14, 2021 Filing 23 MINUTES - IN CHAMBERS by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The Court strikes the Complaint filed by Plaintiff #14 , and the Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint #15 , without prejudice to refiling in accordance with the Court's standing order (provided that the refiling is otherwise timely), see Notice to Filer of Deficiencies #17 . Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
September 10, 2021 Filing 22 First STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Wrong Entity filed by Plaintiff Tibrea L. Cagle.(Pedroza, Irving)
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr, (vcr)
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 PRETRIAL AND TRIAL ORDER by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (vcr)
September 8, 2021 Filing 19 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: The DOE defendants remaining after 11/8/2021 are dismissed by operation of this Order and without further notice. The Court sets the pretrial and trial dates noted in this order based on an evaluation of the complexity of the case. Jury Trial set for 4/18/2022 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Final Pretrial Conference and Hearing on Motions in Limine set for 4/8/2022 10:00 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Motion to Amend Pleadings/Add Parties (Hearing Deadline) 11/8/2021. Non-Expert Discovery cut-off 1/7/2022. Discovery Motion Hearing Deadline 1/14/2022. Non-Discovery Motion Hearing Deadline 1/14/2022. Settlement Conference Deadline 1/28/2022. Post-Settlement Status Conference set for 2/11/2022 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr. Status Report due by 2/4/2022. Trial Filings (First Set) Deadline 3/18/2022. Trial Filings (Second Set) Deadline 3/25/2022. See document for further details. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SANCTIONS AND DENYING REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: On 9/6/2021, after failing to submit their report, the parties filed a request to continue the Mandatory Scheduling Conference (MSC) to 10/15/2021 #13 . Tthe Court denies the requested extension as untimely and lacking good cause. This means that the parties have failed to comply with a court order requiring them to timely file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties are to show cause (OSC) why they and their counsel should not be sanctioned for failing to comply with a court order. Lead counsel for each party shall file a written response to this OSC by no later than 9/17/2021. The MSC on 9/10/2021 is vacated, and the Court will separately issue a case management order based on its review of the complaint and its assessment of the complexity of the case. See document for further details. Court Reporter: N/A. (gk)
September 8, 2021 Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Summons Request #15 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. This pleading is styled as a "Complaint for Damages," however, appears to be a First Amended Complaint. An Answer was filed on 8/12/2021. A party may amend within 21 days after service of a responsive pleading. Once 21 days has passed, a party may amend only with written consent or leave of court. F.R.Civ.P. 15(a) (1)(B), 15(a)(2). The Summons Request cannot be issued without leave to file the instant pleading. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (gk)
September 8, 2021 Filing 16 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. The Court VACATES the Scheduling Conference set for hearing on 9/10/2021. No appearance is required. If the Court determines that a hearing is necessary one will be rescheduled at a later date. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vcr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
September 6, 2021 Filing 15 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER CIVIL MINUTES OF 9/14/2021, SEE DOCKET NO. 23] Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #14 filed by Plaintiff Tibrea L. Cagle. (Pedroza, Irving) Modified on 9/15/2021 (gk).
September 6, 2021 Filing 14 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER CIVIL MINUTES OF 9/14/2021, SEE DOCKET NO. 23] COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31933180 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Tibrea L. Cagle.(Pedroza, Irving) Modified on 9/15/2021 (gk).
September 6, 2021 Filing 13 First REQUEST for Extension of Time to File Rule 26f Report filed by Plaintiff Tibrea L. Cagle. Request set for hearing on 9/10/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge Stanley Blumenfeld Jr.. (Attorney Irving Pedroza added to party Tibrea L. Cagle(pty:pla)) (Pedroza, Irving)
August 24, 2021 Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Maven Lsg, Ltd. LSR.(Attorney Michael Wayne Knapp added to party Maven Lsg, Ltd. LSR(pty:dft))(Knapp, Michael)
August 24, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE filed by defendant Maven Lsg, Ltd. LSR. Consent to Removal (Knapp, Michael)
August 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference is set for 9/10/2021 at 08:30 AM before the Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. in Courtroom 6C. The parties shall file a Joint Rule 26 Meeting Report by 09/03/2021. (jgr)
August 12, 2021 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Maven Drive LLC.(Knapp, Michael)
August 11, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CIVIL STANDING ORDER upon the filing of the complaint by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. (jgr)
August 9, 2021 Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (jtil)
August 9, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
August 9, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (jtil)
August 6, 2021 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Tibrea L. Cagle in Los Angeles Superior Court on 5/25/2021, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil)
August 6, 2021 Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Maven Drive LLC, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 (Knapp, Michael)
August 6, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Maven Drive LLC, (Knapp, Michael)
August 6, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Maven Drive LLC. (Knapp, Michael)
August 6, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angles County Superior Court, case number 21STCV19648 Receipt No: ACACDC-31764630 - Fee: $402, filed by defendant Maven Drive LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1 Complaint (state court), #2 Exhibit A-2 Summons (state court), #3 Exhibit A-3 Civil Cover Sheet (state court), #4 Exhibit A-4 Notice of Case Assignment (state court), #5 Exhibit A-5 CSC Service on Maven Drive LLC (state court)) (Attorney Michael Wayne Knapp added to party Maven Drive LLC(pty:dft))(Knapp, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tibrea L. Cagle v. Amor L. Armour et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tibrea L. Cagle
Represented By: Pratik H Shah
Represented By: Irving Pedroza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amor L. Armour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maven Drive LLC
Represented By: Michael Wayne Knapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maven Lsg, Ltd. LSR
Represented By: Michael Wayne Knapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GCar Titling Ltd
Represented By: Michael Wayne Knapp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 to 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?