Antonio Rodriguez et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
Plaintiff: Antonio Rodriguez and Priscilla Loza
Defendant: County of Los Angeles, Sheriff Alex Villanueva, Alex Villanueva and Does 1-10 inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv06574
Filed: August 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Referring Judge: Virginia A Phillips
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2021 Filing 20 REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #16 filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Alex Villanueva. (Foster, Danielle)
October 4, 2021 Filing 19 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #16 filed by Plaintiffs Priscilla Loza, Antonio Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF V. JAMES DESIMONE, ESQ. IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES)(DeSimone, Vincent)
September 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Scheduling Conference set for 12/13/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
September 23, 2021 Filing 17 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Alex Villanueva(in his official capacity), (Foster, Danielle)
September 23, 2021 Filing 16 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Alex Villanueva(in his official capacity). Motion set for hearing on 10/25/2021 at 02:00 PM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Danielle C Foster added to party Alex Villanueva(pty:dft)) (Foster, Danielle)
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the deadline by which Defendants County of Los Angeles and Sheriff Alex Villanueva must respond to the Complaint for Damages is continued. These defendants shall file a response to the Complaint no later than September 23, 2021, unless plaintiffs file an amended complaint prior to that date. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
September 7, 2021 Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Alex Villanueva(individual). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Danielle C Foster added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Danielle C Foster added to party Alex Villanueva(pty:dft))(Foster, Danielle)
August 24, 2021 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Antonio Rodriguez, Priscilla Loza, upon Defendant County of Los Angeles served on 8/23/2021, answer due 9/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Catherine Medina, Deputy Clerk in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (DeSimone, Vincent)
August 24, 2021 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Antonio Rodriguez, Priscilla Loza, upon Defendant Alex Villanueva(in his official capacity) served on 8/19/2021, answer due 9/9/2021; Alex Villanueva(individual) served on 8/19/2021, answer due 9/9/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Margarita Bevan, Legal Liaison in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (DeSimone, Vincent)
August 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
August 13, 2021 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Alex Villanueva(in his official capacity), Alex Villanueva(individual). (ghap)
August 13, 2021 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant County of Los Angeles. (ghap)
August 13, 2021 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
August 13, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
August 13, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (ghap)
August 13, 2021 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Priscilla Loza, Antonio Rodriguez. (DeSimone, Vincent)
August 13, 2021 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Priscilla Loza, Antonio Rodriguez. (DeSimone, Vincent)
August 13, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Priscilla Loza, Antonio Rodriguez, identifying DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity; SHERIFF ALEX VILLANUEVA in his official and individual capacity; and DOES 1-10 inclusive. (DeSimone, Vincent)
August 13, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Priscilla Loza, Antonio Rodriguez. (DeSimone, Vincent)
August 13, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31806485 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Antonio Rodriguez, Priscilla Loza. (Attorney Vincent James DeSimone added to party Priscilla Loza(pty:pla), Attorney Vincent James DeSimone added to party Antonio Rodriguez(pty:pla))(DeSimone, Vincent)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Antonio Rodriguez et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antonio Rodriguez
Represented By: Vincent James DeSimone
Represented By: Carmen D Sabater
Represented By: Evan Thomas Chavez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Priscilla Loza
Represented By: Vincent James DeSimone
Represented By: Carmen D Sabater
Represented By: Evan Thomas Chavez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Los Angeles
Represented By: Danielle C Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheriff Alex Villanueva
Represented By: Danielle C Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alex Villanueva
Represented By: Danielle C Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10 inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?