Kyu Hwa Back v. McDonalds Corporation
| Kyu Hwa Back |
| McDonalds Corporation and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2021cv06610 |
| August 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to McDonalds Corporation answer now due 11/12/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant McDonalds Corporation.(Attorney Carol Yur added to party McDonalds Corporation(pty:dft))(Yur, Carol) |
Filing 13
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-06610 DMG(RAOx). (rn)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Kyu Hwa Backto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,,, Order to Show Cause,,,, #11 re: Supplemental Jurisdiction (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration)(Kim, Jason) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW CLAIMS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing why the Court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act, Disabled Persons Act, Health and Safety Code section 19955, et seq., and negligence claims. In responding to this Order to Show Cause, Plaintiff shall identify the amount of statutory damages Plaintiff seeks to recover. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by 8/30/2021. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act, Disabled Persons Act, Health and Safety Code section 19955, et seq., and negligence claims, and the dismissal of any such claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1367(c). See document for further details. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 10 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kti) |
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant McDonalds Corporation. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Kyu Hwa Back. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Kyu Hwa Back. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31815680 - Fee: $402. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party Kyu Hwa Back(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
