Lilian Quintanilla Valdez v. Craig Roberts et al
| Lilian Quintanilla Valdez |
| Craig Roberts, Steven Gordon and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2021cv06705 |
| August 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Karen E Scott |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Lilian Quintanilla Valdez pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Steven Gordon. (Lipeles, Kevin) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Craig Roberts.(Murphy, Molly) |
Filing 14
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from Local Rules. (ys)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Steven Gordon answer now due 10/18/2021; Craig Roberts answer now due 10/18/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Steven Gordon; Craig Roberts.(Attorney Molly S Murphy added to party Steven Gordon(pty:dft), Attorney Molly S Murphy added to party Craig Roberts(pty:dft))(Murphy, Molly) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Lilian Quintanilla Valdez, upon Defendant Steven Gordon served on 8/27/2021, answer due 9/17/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Juan Jarrett, Management Service Technician - Person in Charge in compliance with statute not specified by method of service not specified.Original Summons NOT returned. (Lipeles, Kevin) |
| Filing 11 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Lilian Quintanilla Valdez. (Lipeles, Kevin) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: MISC - Other Miscellaneous Case #2 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Incorrect event of MISC - Other Miscellaneous Case was selected in the e-filing of the CV Cover Sheet. The correct event is located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings.. (car) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Steven Gordon. (car) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Craig Roberts. (car) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Lilian Quintanilla Valdez, (Lipeles, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Lilian Quintanilla Valdez. (Lipeles, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Lilian Quintanilla Valdez. (Lipeles, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET with filing fee previously paid ($402.00 paid on 08/18/2021, receipt number BCACDC-31834492), filed by Plaintiff Lilian Quintanilla Valdez.(Lipeles, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-31834492 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Lilian Quintanilla Valdez. (Attorney Kevin A Lipeles added to party Lilian Quintanilla Valdez(pty:bkmov))(Lipeles, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
