Joseph L. Garces v. City of Santa Paula et al
| JOSEPH L GARCES and Joseph L. Garces |
| City of Santa Paula, OFFICER CHRIS RIVERA and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv06730 |
| August 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Pedro V Castillo |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Joseph L. Garces, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon City of Santa Paula in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Dunn, Brian) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #15 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by October 1, 2021. (lc) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #15 . The following error(s) was/were found: Filer selected incorrect Statute Prompt as FRCP 5(b)(2)(D). Service was not made on the Clerks Office of the USDC and created incorrect docket entry which does not correspond to the proof of service for defendant City of Santa Paula. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc) |
| Filing 15 (STRICKEN PER COURT'S G112B RESPONSE DOCKET NO. 17).PROOF OF SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Joseph L. Garces, upon Defendant City of Santa Paula served on 8/24/2021, answer due 9/14/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Dunn, Brian) Modified on 10/1/2021 (lc). |
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Proof of Service #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days). Other error(s) with document(s): This efiling event can be found - Service Documents - Service/Waivers of Summons and Complaints - Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days). This event will calculate when the Answer is due. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lom) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Joseph L. Garces, served on 08/24/2021. (Dunn, Brian) |
Filing 12
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (vv)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants City of Santa Paula, Chris Rivera, (Procter, James) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants City of Santa Paula, Chris Rivera.(Attorney James N Procter, II added to party City of Santa Paula(pty:dft), Attorney James N Procter, II added to party Chris Rivera(pty:dft))(Procter, James) |
| Filing 9 Plaintiff's CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Joseph L. Garces, (Lyman, Edward) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants City of Santa Paula, Chris Rivera. (lh) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo. (lh) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH L GARCES. (Lyman, Edward) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH L GARCES. (Lyman, Edward) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31841140 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff JOSEPH L GARCES. (Attorney Edward M Lyman, III added to party JOSEPH L GARCES(pty:pla))(Lyman, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
