Sabina Hack v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A., et al
| Sabina Hack |
| WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. and Does 1 through 10 |
| 2:2021cv06838 |
| August 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Real Property: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Josephine L. Staton, the court GRANTS the parties' motion #14 and DISMISSES Plaintiff's action WITH PREJUDICE. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
| Filing 14 Joint NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case with Prejudice filed by defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rackers, Mark) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER Continuing Wells Fargo Bank's Responsive Pleading Deadline for Thirty (30) Days #12 by Judge Josephine L. Staton as follows: The deadline for Wells Fargo to file its responsive pleading to the Complaint shall be continued to 10/25/2021. (jp)
|
| Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION to Continue Responsive Pleading from September 24, 2021 to October 25, 2021 Re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Mark Gerard Rackers added to party Wells Fargo Bank N.A.(pty:dft))(Rackers, Mark) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Sabina Hack, upon Defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A. served on 9/3/2021, answer due 9/24/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC - Koy Saechao - Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Murphy, Susan) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (jp) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by SABINA HACK Sabina Hack. (Murphy, Susan) |
| Filing 8 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON (mku) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: The time to answer for federal governmental agencies is 60 days. All other parties must receive 21 days. Suggestion: Please see Form AO 440 (Rev. 06/12). The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (esa) |
| Filing 6 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (esa) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Sabina Hack. (Murphy, Susan) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by SABINA HACK Sabina Hack. (Murphy, Susan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31866824 - Fee: $402, filed by SABINA HACK Sabina Hack. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S) (Attorney Susan M Murphy added to party Sabina Hack(pty:pla))(Murphy, Susan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
