Stacy Morgan v. Grande Cosmetics, LLC
| Stacy Morgan |
| Grande Cosmetics, LLC |
| 2:2021cv06839 |
| August 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Margo A Rocconi |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Stacy Morgan. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Persinger, Annick) |
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Allison W. Parr. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Grande Cosmetics, LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Margo A. Rocconi. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Stacy Morgan, (Persinger, Annick) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiffs Stacy Morgan. (Persinger, Annick) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Stacy Morgan. (Persinger, Annick) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31867170 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiffs Stacy Morgan. (Attorney Annick Marie Persinger added to party Stacy Morgan(pty:pla))(Persinger, Annick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stacy Morgan v. Grande Cosmetics, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stacy Morgan | |
| Represented By: | Annick Marie Persinger |
| Represented By: | Hassan A Zavareei |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Grande Cosmetics, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
