Selinda Arreola et al v. Billie, Inc.
Plaintiff: Selinda Arreola
Defendant: Billie, Inc. and Does 1 - 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2021cv06927
Filed: August 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael R Wilner
Referring Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Selinda Arreola. (Smith, Evan)
September 2, 2021 Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Billie, Inc. answer now due 10/4/2021, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Billie, Inc..(Culp Cloyd, Kimberly)
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 10/25/2021 to 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
August 27, 2021 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Billie, Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #8 , Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel (G-123), #7 served on August 27, 2021. (Culp Cloyd, Kimberly)
August 27, 2021 Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT and Notice of Interested Parties Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1-1 filed by Defendant Billie, Inc. (Culp Cloyd, Kimberly)
August 27, 2021 Filing 7 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Tyler Griffin Newby counsel for Defendant Billie, Inc.. Adding Tyler G. Newby as counsel of record for Billie, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Billie, Inc.. (Newby, Tyler)
August 27, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 4 Civil Cover Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh)
August 27, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (lh)
August 27, 2021 Filing 4 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
August 27, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
August 27, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh)
August 27, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County of Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV27331 Receipt No: ACACDC-31885772 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Billie, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (State Court Civil Case Cover Sheet; State Court Summons; State Court Class Action Complaint; State Court Notice of Case Assignment), #2 Exhibit B (State Court Minute Order, State Court Initial Status Conference Orde4; State Court Certificate of Mailing; State Court Proof of Service of Summons), #3 Declaration of Jason Bravman in Support of Defendant Billie, Inc.'s Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Kimberly Irene Culp Cloyd added to party Billie, Inc.(pty:dft))(Culp Cloyd, Kimberly)
August 27, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Billie, Inc., Does. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Selinda Arreola. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 7/26/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)
August 27, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff Selinda Arreola, upon Defendant Billie, Inc. served on 7/28/2021, answer due 8/18/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lyanne Gares, Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 8/3/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Selinda Arreola et al v. Billie, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Selinda Arreola
Represented By: Evan Jason Smith
Represented By: Ryan P Cardona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Billie, Inc.
Represented By: Kimberly Irene Culp Cloyd
Represented By: Tyler Griffin Newby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 - 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?