FenceScreen, Inc. v. D.C. Humphrys Co. et al
FenceScreen, Inc. |
D.C. Humphrys Co. and Ronald B. Nissenbaum |
2:2021cv06940 |
August 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra-district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Southern Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Douglas F. McCormick. New Case Number 8:21-cv-01406 CJC (DFMx). (lh) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants D.C. Humphrys Co., Ronald B. Nissenbaum, (Wohrle, Joseph) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants D.C. Humphrys Co., Ronald B. Nissenbaum. (Wohrle, Joseph) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orange County Superior Court, case number 30-2021-01210945 Receipt No: ACACDC-31887948 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendants Ronald B. Nissenbaum, D.C. Humphrys Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Summons, #3 Proof of Service) (Attorney Joseph P Wohrle added to party D.C. Humphrys Co.(pty:dft), Attorney Joseph P Wohrle added to party Ronald B. Nissenbaum(pty:dft))(Wohrle, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.