Hermozo Textile, LLC v. Honey Love Apparel, Inc. et al
| Hermozo Textile, LLC |
| Honey Love Apparel, Inc., DOES 1 through 10, Does 1-10 and Three Brothers Apparel, Corp. doing business as Tresser |
| 2:2021cv06950 |
| August 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Hermozo Textile, LLC. Dismissal is Without Prejudice. (Schultz, Kelsey) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hermozo Textile, LLC, upon Defendant Three Brothers Apparel, Corp. served on 9/16/2021, answer due 10/7/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Julian B Lee - Registered Agent for Service of Process c/o Tressa L. - Receptionist, Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 13
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF DOE AMENDMENT NAMING THREE BROTHER APPAREL, CORP. AS DOE 1 #12 by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. The DOE AMENDMENT naming Three Brothers Apparel, Corp., individually and doing business as "Tresser", a California corporation as DOE 1 is hereby approved and filed, and Three Brothers Apparel, Corp., individually and doing business as "Tresser", is hereby named as a defendant in this action. SO ORDERED. (yl)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF DOE AMENDMENT NAMING THREE BROTHER APPAREL, CORP. AS DOE 1 filed by Plaintiff Hermozo Textile, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hermozo Textile, LLC, upon Defendant Honey Love Apparel, Inc. served on 9/2/2021, answer due 9/23/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Eduardo G. Sanchez\Registered Agent for Service of Process c/o Myra Sanchez - Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Doniger, Stephen) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (cch)
|
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Honey Love Apparel, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (lh) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Hermozo Textile, LLC. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Hermozo Textile, LLC. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Hermozo Textile, LLC, identifying HONEY LOVE APPAREL, INC.. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Hermozo Textile, LLC. (Doniger, Stephen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31889824 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Hermozo Textile, LLC. (Attorney Stephen M. Doniger added to party Hermozo Textile, LLC(pty:pla))(Doniger, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
