Krystle Bonilla v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Krystle Bonilla |
| Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv06983 |
| August 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| John F Walter |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 21
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge John F. Walter. In the Notice of Settlement filed on October 11, 2021 #20 , the parties represent that they have settled this action. As a result, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice subject to either party reopening the action on or before January 10, 2022. The Court will retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement until January 10, 2022. Thereafter, absent further order of the Court, the dismissal of this action will be with prejudice. All dates in this action, including the trial date are vacated. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Krystle Bonilla. (Chae, Larry) |
|
Filing 19
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter.The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 3/11/2022 at 8:00 AM. Hearing on Motions in Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions set for 3/18/2022 at 8:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 3/29/2021 at 8:30 AM. (iv)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION, and DISMISSING ANY UNSERVED DOE DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on October 4, 2021 is vacated and taken off calendar.A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties' Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby: ORDERS this case referred to: ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation). The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: December 13, 2021. The Joint Report re: Results of Settlement Conference due on: December 17, 2021. (iv)
|
| Filing 17 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 16 DECLARATION of Larry Chae per Standing Order filed by Plaintiff Krystle Bonilla. (Chae, Larry) |
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Krystle Bonilla, (Chae, Larry) |
| Filing 14 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.. (Proudfoot, Douglas) |
| Filing 13 DECLARATION of Douglas Proudfoot filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Douglas) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Douglas A Proudfoot on behalf of Defendant Ford Motor Company (Attorney Douglas A Proudfoot added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Proudfoot, Douglas) |
| Filing 11 DECLARATION of Matthew M. Proudfoot filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for October 4, 2021 at 1:15 p.m. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before September 20, 2021. The title page of the Joint Report must state the date and time of the Scheduling Conference. See minute order for details. (lom)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Matthew M Proudfoot on behalf of Defendant Ford Motor Company (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Matthew M. Proudfoot re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 21STCV21639 Receipt No: ACACDC-31896045 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons & Complaint - State Court, #2 Answer to Complaint - State Court) (Attorney Matthew M Proudfoot added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Proudfoot, Matthew) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/25/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Ford Motor Company., filed by plaintiff Krystle Bonilla. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/10/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
