Sennett Devermont v. County of Los Angeles et al
Plaintiff: Sennett Devermont
Defendant: County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department and Sergeant Brian Muller
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Phyllis Cheng
Case Number: 2:2021cv07028
Filed: August 31, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Referring Judge: Dale S Fischer
2 Judge: Karen E Scott
3 Judge: Christina A Snyder
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2022 Filing 33 MEDIATION REPORT Filed by Mediator (ADR Panel) Phyllis Cheng: Mediation held on September 15, 2022. The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time.Counsel: Please evaluate the effectiveness of the ADR Program by completing a survey on your mediation experience. To access the survey, click on the following link: #MediationParticipantSurvey(Cheng, Phyllis)
August 2, 2022 Filing 32 NOTICE OF MEDIATION DATE filed. Mediation set for September 15, 2022.(Cheng, Phyllis)
July 8, 2022 Filing 31 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Julia N Quesada counsel for Plaintiff Sennett Devermont. Adding Julia N. Quesada as counsel of record for Sennett Devermont for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff by Attorney Julia N. Quesada. (Attorney Julia N Quesada added to party Sennett Devermont(pty:pla))(Quesada, Julia)
July 8, 2022 Filing 30 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Panel Mediator. Mediator (ADR Panel) Phyllis Cheng has been assigned to serve as Panel Mediator. (lst)
July 7, 2022 Filing 29 STIPULATION REGARDING SELECTION of Panel Mediator filed. Parties stipulate that Phyllis W. Cheng may serve as Panel Mediator. Plaintiff obtained the Panel Mediators consent to serve. Filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Brian Muller(Raza, Aamir)
June 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than March 28, 2023. (es)
April 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OR WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: Granting #26 Plaintiff Sennett Devermont Request to Substitute Attorney DeWitt M Lacy as attorney of record instead of Eduardo M. Madrid, Esq., and Erica L. Madrid, Esq. (es)
April 15, 2022 Filing 26 REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY DeWitt M. Lacy in place of attorney Eduardo M. Madrid and Erica L. Madrid filed by plaintiff Sennett Devermont. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order on Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney) (Madrid, Eduardo)
January 4, 2022 Filing 25 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Aamir Raza counsel for Defendants County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Brian Muller, Brian Muller. SAHRA NADINE AGHAREZAEI is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants by Attorney Aamir Raza. (Raza, Aamir)
January 4, 2022 Filing 24 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Aamir Raza counsel for Defendants County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Brian Muller, Brian Muller. Adding Aamir Raza as counsel of record for Defendants for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants by Attorney Aamir Raza. (Attorney Aamir Raza added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Aamir Raza added to party Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department(pty:dft), Attorney Aamir Raza added to party Brian Muller(pty:dft), Attorney Aamir Raza added to party Brian Muller(pty:dft))(Raza, Aamir)
December 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 23 SCHEDULING AND PREPARATION FOR CIVIL TRIAL ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. A jury trial in this case will commence on Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. Trial is estimated to take 4 days. Counsel1 shall be governed by the following pretrial deadlines: SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS. (es) .
December 1, 2021 Filing 22 CONSENT TO PROCEED before United States Magistrate Judge by all parties pursuant to GO 18-11 is approved by District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. This case is hereby reassigned to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott for all further proceedings. Case number will now read 2:21-cv-07028 KES. (rn)
November 30, 2021 Filing 21 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Text Only Scheduling Notice, 20 (Attachments: #1 Statement of Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge)(Sprenger, Christina)
November 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 20 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The parties stipulate in the Joint Report at docket #19 to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all purposes. Counsel are to file form CV-11D which can be found on the Courts website, located at http://intranet/forms/Lists/CACD%20Forms/Attachments/447/CV-11D.pdf, no later than November 29, 2021. The scheduling conference is continued to December 13, 2021.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
November 15, 2021 Filing 19 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3 - 4 days, filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Brian Muller, Brian Muller.. (Sprenger, Christina)
October 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 11/22/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
October 22, 2021 Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Brian Muller(individually), Brian Muller(in his official capacity as a sergeant with the County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department).(Attorney Christina M Sprenger added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Christina M Sprenger added to party Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department(pty:dft), Attorney Christina M Sprenger added to party Brian Muller(pty:dft), Attorney Christina M Sprenger added to party Brian Muller(pty:dft))(Sprenger, Christina)
September 23, 2021 Filing 16 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Brian Muller(individually), Brian Muller(in his official capacity as a sergeant with the County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department), (Beach, Paul)
September 23, 2021 Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Brian Muller(individually) answer now due 10/22/2021; Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department answer now due 10/22/2021; Brian Muller(in his official capacity as a sergeant with the County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department) answer now due 10/22/2021; County of Los Angeles answer now due 10/22/2021, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Brian Muller(individually); Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department; Brian Muller(in his official capacity as a sergeant with the County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department); County of Los Angeles.(Attorney Paul B Beach added to party County of Los Angeles(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B Beach added to party Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B Beach added to party Brian Muller(pty:dft), Attorney Paul B Beach added to party Brian Muller(pty:dft))(Beach, Paul)
September 17, 2021 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Sennett Devermont, upon Defendant Brian Muller(individually) served on 9/15/2021, answer due 10/6/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sherrie Gulley, Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with statute not specified by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Madrid, Eduardo)
September 15, 2021 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Sennett Devermont, upon Defendant County of Los Angeles served on 9/8/2021, answer due 9/29/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Reuben Khosbikian, Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Madrid, Eduardo)
September 15, 2021 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Sennett Devermont, upon Defendant Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department served on 9/3/2021, answer due 9/24/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jahel Saucedo, Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Madrid, Eduardo)
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 21-01. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:21-cv-07028 DSF(JCx). (rn)
August 31, 2021 Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department, Brian Muller(individually), Brian Muller(in his official capacity as a sergeant with the County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department). (lh)
August 31, 2021 Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh)
August 31, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
August 31, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (lh)
August 31, 2021 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Sennett Devermont. (Madrid, Eduardo)
August 31, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by plaintiff Sennett Devermont. (Madrid, Eduardo)
August 31, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Sennett Devermont, identifying Sennett Devermont, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department Sergeant Brian Muller. (Madrid, Eduardo)
August 31, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Sennett Devermont. (Madrid, Eduardo)
August 31, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31904696 - Fee: $402, filed by plaintiff Sennett Devermont. (Attorney Eduardo M Madrid added to party Sennett Devermont(pty:pla))(Madrid, Eduardo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sennett Devermont v. County of Los Angeles et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sennett Devermont
Represented By: Eduardo M Madrid
Represented By: Erica Lynn Madrid
Represented By: DeWitt M Lacy
Represented By: Julia N Quesada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Los Angeles
Represented By: Christina M Sprenger
Represented By: Sahra Nadine Agharezaei
Represented By: Paul B Beach
Represented By: Aamir Raza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department
Represented By: Christina M Sprenger
Represented By: Sahra Nadine Agharezaei
Represented By: Paul B Beach
Represented By: Aamir Raza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sergeant Brian Muller
Represented By: Christina M Sprenger
Represented By: Sahra Nadine Agharezaei
Represented By: Paul B Beach
Represented By: Aamir Raza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Alternative dispute resolution (adr) provider: Phyllis Cheng
Represented By: Phyllis Wei-Erh Cheng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?