Rex Miller v. Starbucks Corporation et al
| Rex Miler |
| Starbucks Corporation, Freddy Ambriz and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv07034 |
| August 31, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. The matter is set for a scheduling conference on November 24, 2021 at 10:30 AM via Zoom videoconference. The conference will be held pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). The parties are reminded of their obligation to disclose information and confer on a discovery plan not later than 21 days prior to the scheduling conference and to submit a joint report to the Court not later than 14 days after they confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Local Rule 26-1. Counsel are further directed to submit form ADR-1, located on the Courts website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov, no later than 7 days before the scheduling conference date. Judge Kims Zoom Webinar information can be found on his page on the Courts website at http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/honorable-steve-kim. The parties should log in no later than ten minutes prior to the scheduled hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED. (clee)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, this case remains assigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim for final disposition re: Consent to Proceed (CV-11C) before US Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program Non-Final #13 , Consent to Proceed (CV-11C) before US Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program Non-Final #17 . (aco) |
| Filing 17 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendants Freddy Ambriz, Starbucks Corporation. (Villamor, Myra) |
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Freddy Ambriz, Starbucks Corporation, (Villamor, Myra) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition, #12 filed by Defendants Freddy Ambriz, Starbucks Corporation.(Villamor, Myra) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Rex Miler, re Reminder Notice to Counsel (CV-14) re MJ Civil Consent Pilot Project - optional html form, #10 served on 10/01/2021. (Kisob Alaric-Lorenzo, Apemwoyah) |
| Filing 13 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Kisob Alaric-Lorenzo, Apemwoyah) |
| Filing 12 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiff Rex Miler (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Kisob Alaric-Lorenzo, Apemwoyah) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Myra B. Villamor counsel for Defendants Freddy Ambriz, Starbucks Corporation. Adding Myra B. Villamor as counsel of record for Starbucks Corporation and Freddy Ambriz for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Starbucks Corporation and Feddy Ambriz. (Attorney Myra B. Villamor added to party Freddy Ambriz(pty:dft), Attorney Myra B. Villamor added to party Starbucks Corporation(pty:dft))(Villamor, Myra) |
| Filing 10 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Rex Miler, upon Defendant Freddy Ambriz acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 9/16/2021, answer due 10/15/2021. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Ashley Arnett, Attorney. (Kisob Alaric-Lorenzo, Apemwoyah) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Starbucks Corporation answer now due 10/15/2021; Freddy Ambriz answer now due 10/15/2021, filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation; Freddy Ambriz.(Attorney Ashley Nicole Arnett added to party Freddy Ambriz(pty:dft), Attorney Ashley Nicole Arnett added to party Starbucks Corporation(pty:dft))(Arnett, Ashley) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Rex Miler, upon Defendant Starbucks Corporation served on 9/3/2021, answer due 9/24/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC Lawyers- Koy Saechao - Authorized to Accept Service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kisob Alaric-Lorenzo, Apemwoyah) |
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Freddy Ambriz and Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 FAmbriz) (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Rex Miler. (Kisob Alaric-Lorenzo, Apemwoyah) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff REX MILLER. (Kisob Alaric-Lorenzo, Apemwoyah) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff REX MILLER, (Kisob Alaric-Lorenzo, Apemwoyah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: BCACDC-31905925 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff REX MILLER. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Apemwoyah Kisob Alaric-Lorenzo added to party REX MILLER(pty:pla))(Kisob Alaric-Lorenzo, Apemwoyah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
