Rachel English v. Bestbuy Co., Inc. et al
| Rachel English |
| Bestbuy Co., Inc. and BestBuy Stores, L.P. |
| 2:2021cv07085 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. No later than October 29, 2021, plaintiff shall file a Second Amended Complaint setting forth the basis for the court's subject matter jurisdiction. (iv)
|
| Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant BestBuy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy Co., Inc. amending Complaint - (Referred), #1 , filed by Plaintiff Rachel English. (iv) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant BestBuy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy Co., Inc. (iv) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint - (Referred), #1 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write "see attached." Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (es) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: IT IS ORDERED that the #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) is hereby GRANTED. (es)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error, this case was assigned as a civil rights in error; Incorrect judge's initials were indicated on this action and document; Incorrect magistrate judge's initials were indicated on this action and document. Re: Complaint - (Referred), #1 , REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 the Case has been reassigned from Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon and Judge George H. Wu to Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott for all further proceedings. The case will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV21-7085-FMO(JEMx). (aco) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (car) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Rachel English. (car) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Rachel English (car) |
| Filing 1 [NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED ON 9/3/2021, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 5] COMPLAINT filed against Defendants BestBuy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy Co., Inc. Case assigned to Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon, filed by Plaintiff Rachel English. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (car) Modified on 9/3/2021 (aco). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
