Stephanie Jaramillo v. The Walt Disney Company, et al
| Stephanie Jaramillo |
| The Walt Disney Company, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Walt Disney Parks and Resorts,U.S., Inc. |
| 2:2021cv07088 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Karen E Scott |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. The Court, having reviewed the Parties' Stipulation (Dkt. 25) and finding GOOD CAUSE, the Court hereby approves the Stipulated Protective Order. re Stipulation for Protective Order #25 (es)
|
| Filing 25 Joint STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts,U.S., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Protective Order Re: Confidential Information)(Spear, Zachary) |
|
Filing 24
ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (gga)
|
|
Filing 23
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: JURY TRIAL by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. The court deems a Scheduling Conference unnecessary and hereby vacates the hearing. The final pretrial conference and hearing on motions in limine is scheduled for December 2, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. The trial is scheduled to begin on December 20, 2022, at 9:00 a.m. (iv)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER RE. STIPULATION EXTENDING FRCP RULE 26(A) INITIAL DISCLOSURES DEADLINE #19 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for Details.* (iv)
|
| Filing 21 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Deputy Clerk of Court. A proposed order shall be lodged pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.4.1 no later than November 30, 2021. A Word version of the proposed order shall be e-mailed to the following: fmo_chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov. (gga) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation #19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
| Filing 19 STIPULATION to Continue Initial Disclosures from November 30, 2021 to December 20, 2021 filed by plaintiff Stephanie Jaramillo.(Sethi, Rahul) |
| Filing 18 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 4 days, filed by Plaintiff Stephanie Jaramillo.. (Sethi, Rahul) |
| Filing 17 ANSWER to Amended Complaint #14 filed by Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts,U.S., Inc..(Attorney Zachary L Spear added to party Walt Disney Parks and Resorts,U.S., Inc.(pty:dft))(Spear, Zachary) |
| Filing 16 21 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint #14 as to Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts,U.S., Inc. (iv) |
| Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint #14 filed by plaintiff Stephanie Jaramillo. (Sethi, Rahul) |
| Filing 14 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts,U.S., Inc. amending Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , filed by Plaintiff Stephanie Jaramillo. (iv) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT #11 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. *See Order for Details.* (iv)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION for Leave to file first amended complaint filed by plaintiff Stephanie Jaramillo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed FAC)(Sethi, Rahul) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/24/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 12/9/2021 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (gga)
|
| Filing 9 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (gga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams to Judge Fernando M. Olguin for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:21-cv-07088 FMO(KESx). (rn) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Compliance Re Removal filed by Defendant The Walt Disney Company. (Spear, Zachary) |
| Filing 6 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (In Chambers) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams under the Civil Consent Pilot Project. The parties are reminded to review the time requirements for consent set forth in the Notice to Counsel that was issued at the time of the filing of the notice of removal. Defendant is instructed to forthwith serve a copy of this Order on all parties that have already been served with the notice of removal, or to serve all parties with a copy of this Order at the time of service of the notice of removal. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ch) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (esa) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Walt Disney Company, (Luevano, Emma) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant The Walt Disney Company. (Luevano, Emma) |
| Filing 2 DECLARATION of Emma Luevano re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant The Walt Disney Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-Summons, #3 Exhibit C-Civil Case Cover Sheet, #4 Exhibit D-Notice of Case Assignment, #5 Exhibit E-Notice of Case Management Conference, #6 Exhibit F-Plaintiff's Peremptory Challenge, #7 Exhibit G-Minute Order Re Peremptory Challenge, #8 Exhibit H-Notice of Case Reassignment, #9 Exhibit I-Certificate of Mailing, #10 Exhibit J-Notice of Case Management Conference, #11 Exhibit K-Answer to Unverified Complaint)(Luevano, Emma) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21STCV28212 Receipt No: ACACDC-31921674 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant The Walt Disney Company. (Attorney Emma Luevano added to party The Walt Disney Company(pty:dft))(Luevano, Emma) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, The Walt Disney Company, Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Stephanie Jaramillo. (filed in state court 8/2/2021, submitted as document 2, attachment 1) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant The Walt Disney Company. (filed in state court 8/31/2021, submitted as document 2, attachment 11)(esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
