Stacey Ann Foster v. Paul M. Nakasone et al
Plaintiff: Stacey Ann Foster
Defendant: General Paul M. Nakasone, Acting Chair, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Rosa Viramontes
Case Number: 2:2021cv07106
Filed: September 1, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Steve Kim
Referring Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2021 Filing 7 JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, Related to: Order Dismissing Action for Lack of Jurisdiction #6 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the complaint is dismissed without leave to amend and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
September 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The complaint is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction without leave to amend. Judgment dismissing this action with prejudice will be entered accordingly. The Clerk's Office is instructed to return the amount of the civil filing fee paid by Plaintiff. (see document for further details) (hr)
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN CIVIL RIGHTS CASES by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (see document for details) (Attachments: #1 Blank Consent Form) (hr)
September 3, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (car)
September 2, 2021 Filing 3 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendants Acting Chair, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Paul M. Nakasone, Rosa Viramontes. (car)
September 1, 2021 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Stacey Ann Foster (car)
September 1, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim.(Filing fee $402 FEE PAID), filed by Plaintiff Stacey Ann Foster. (car) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/3/2021: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stacey Ann Foster v. Paul M. Nakasone et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacey Ann Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: General Paul M. Nakasone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Acting Chair, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rosa Viramontes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?