Ann McConnell v. State Farm General Insurance Company, et al
| Ann McConnell, an individual, and Trustee of the Ann N. McConnell Trust Dated and Ann McConnell |
| State Farm General Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation erroneously sued as STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A California Corporation, DOES 1 through 50, inclusive., State Farm General Insurance Company and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv07107 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| George H Wu |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge George H. Wu. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds it can set the schedule in this matter without hearing further statements from the parties. As per C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15, the October 21, 2021, scheduling conference date is taken off calendar. The Court sets the following dates: (Amended Pleadings due by 10/29/2021. Discovery cut-off 4/8/2022. Motion hearing cutoff: by 6/6/2022. Last date to conduct mediation is 2/23/2022. Jury Trial set for 7/19/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge George H. Wu. Pretrial Conference set for 7/7/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. Post-Mediation Status Conference set for 2/28/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu.) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 12 TEXT-ONLY ENTRY - IN CHAMBERS: by Judge George H. Wu: Counsel are to appear telephonically for Thursday's 10/21/2021 scheduling conference at 8:30 a.m. by contacting the court clerk at javier_gonzalez@cacd.uscourts.gov for dial-in information. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jag) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 - 7 days, filed by Plaintiff Ann McConnell.. (Malczynski, Matthew) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. Wu. (Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/14/2021. Scheduling Conference set for 10/21/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu.) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER RE FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE JUDGE GEORGE H. WU by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:21-cv-07107 GW(SKx). (rn) |
| Filing 7 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Elie, Steven) |
|
Filing 6
INITIAL ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Plaintiff(s) shall serve the Complaint promptly in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Immediately following service of the Complaint, Plaintiff(s) shall file proofs of service in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(1) and Local Rule 5-3. Service must be completed within the time specified by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) unless the Court otherwise orders. Any Defendant not timely served may be dismissed from the action without prejudice, including any "Doe" or fictitious Defendants. [See document for details.] (es)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, Jury Demand, filed by defendant State Farm General Insurance Company(an Illinois corporation). (filed in state court 9/2/2021, submitted as document 1, attachment 2)(esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, State Farm General Insurance Company(a California corporation), Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Ann McConnell. (filed in state court 8/5/2021, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation erroneously sued as STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A California Corporation, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties, #2 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 served on 09/02/2021. (Elie, Steven) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation erroneously sued as STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A California Corporation. (Elie, Steven) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation erroneously sued as STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A California Corporation, identifying State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Elie, Steven) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court - Central District, case number 21STCV28866 Receipt No: ACACDC-31922993 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation erroneously sued as STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A California Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Answer, #3 Exhibit C - Summons, #4 Exhibit D - Jurat) (Attorney Steven J. Elie added to party State Farm General Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation erroneously sued as STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A California Corporation(pty:dft))(Elie, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
