Maria G. Reyna v. Valassis Direct Mail, Inc. et al
| Maria G. Reyna |
| Valassis Direct Mail, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv07114 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patricia Donahue |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Elizabeth A Han counsel for Defendant Valassis Direct Mail, Inc.. Adding Elizabeth Anne Han as counsel of record for Valassis Direct Mail, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Valassis Direct Mail, Inc.. (Han, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 20 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Elizabeth A Han counsel for Defendant Valassis Direct Mail, Inc.. Sarah Y. Oh is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Valassis Direct Mail, Inc.. (Attorney Elizabeth A Han added to party Valassis Direct Mail, Inc.(pty:dft))(Han, Elizabeth) |
Filing 19
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 1/9/23. (rfi)
|
| Filing 18 TEXT ONLY ENTRY: (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER. The establishes the case management dates as proposed by parties in the Joint Rule 26(f) Report as further described in the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates except as noted in the Order re Trial. (See Order re Trial for specific dates and times.) These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine unless the Court orders otherwise. All fictitiously named defendants are dismissed. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRYTHERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 17
Order re Jury Trial by Judge Dale S. Fischer. These dates and requirements are firm. The Court is very unlikely to grant continuances unless the parties establish good cause through a concrete showing. Failure to complete discovery in a timely manner does not constitute good cause, nor does the fact that a settlement conference is pending. Each side is limited to five motions in limine, unless the Court orders otherwise. See Trial Order for specifics. Final Pretrial Conference is set for 3/6/2023 at 3:00 PM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. Jury Trial is set for 4/4/2023 at 8:30 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (jgr)
|
| Filing 16 DECLARATION of Carlos Andres Perez re Text Only Scheduling Notice,,,,,,,,,,, 13 filed by Plaintiff Maria G. Reyna. (Perez, Carlos) |
| Filing 15 DECLARATION of Sarah Y. Oh re Joint Report Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan #14 filed by Defendant Valassis Direct Mail, Inc.. (Briggs, Glenn) |
| Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Corrected ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Plaintiff Maria G. Reyna.. (Perez, Carlos) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SANCTIONS. This overburdened court and its staff do not have time to communicate repeatedly with counsel in an effort to have them follow the rules and orders of this Court. Counsel have failed to comply with the Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates in one or more respects. For example, counsel may have (1) failed to file a Joint 26(f) Report at all, (2) failed to provide all of the information required by the Order, (3) failed to attach a Schedule, or (4) failed to complete the Schedule properly. Counsel are ordered to show cause why each side should not be sanctioned in the amount of $500 for their failure to comply with the Order. Counsel whose signature appears on the Joint 26(f) Report must file a declaration stating who was (1) responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, (2) responsible for preparing and reviewing the Report and ensuring its accuracy and compliance with the Order, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The declaration should state the name of that person (only if the person is an attorney) and the position of that person (partner, associate, paralegal, assistant, secretary, etc.). The declaration shall also state why the Report failed to comply with the Order. If no Report was filed, the declaration must state who was (1) responsible for calendaring the date for meeting with counsel and filing the Report, (2) responsible for responsible for meeting with opposing counsel, and (3) responsible for filing the Report. The same information as to name and position must be provided as well as an explanation as to why no Report was filed. In addition, the parties are ordered to review the Order Setting Scheduling Conference and the attached Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates carefully, and to provide a Report and a Schedule that provides specific dates for all of the relevant items in the Schedule. The dates must comply with the time frames in the Weeks before trial column and the required days of the week: a Monday (not a holiday) for the pretrial conference and last day for hearing motions and a Tuesday (not a holiday) for trial. The declarations, Report, and Schedule are due within five Court days. The filing of compliant declarations, Report, and Schedule will be a sufficient response to this Order to Show Cause. The scheduling conference date is vacated. The parties are urged to conduct themselves in a professional manner and to make every effort to agree on dates. Further failures to comply with the rules and orders of this Court, and the rules and orders of the Central District, will result in sanctions against one or both parties. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (rfi) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 7 days, filed by Plaintiff Maria G. Reyna.. (Perez, Carlos) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 10/18/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner to Judge Dale S. Fischer for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:21-cv-07114 DSF(PDx). (rn) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Valassis Direct Mail, Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Request for Judicial Notice, #4 , Notice to Counsel (CV-20a) Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program - optional html form #5 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on 9/3/2021. (Briggs, Glenn) |
| Filing 7 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Plaintiff Maria G. Reyna. The Plaintiff does not consent. (Perez, Carlos) |
| Filing 6 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (vm) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Valassis Direct Mail, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Maria G. Reyna. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 6/23/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Executed by Plaintiff Maria G. Reyna, upon Defendant Valassis Direct Mail, Inc. served on 8/4/2021, answer due 8/25/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jessie Gastelum, Intake Specialist in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 8/30/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Valassis Direct Mail, Inc. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 9/1/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF VALASSIS DIRECT MAIL, INC.'S REMOVAL OF THE CIVIL ACTION TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNDER 28 U.S.C. SECTIONS 1332 AND 1441 (DIVERSITY) filed by Defendant Valassis Direct Mail, Inc.. (Briggs, Glenn) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Valassis Direct Mail, Inc., identifying 1. Maria G. Reyna (Plaintiff); 2. Valassis Direct Mail, Inc. (Defendant); 3. Vericast (parent company of Valassis Direct Mail, Inc.). (Briggs, Glenn) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Valassis Direct Mail, Inc.. (Briggs, Glenn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number 21STCV23360 Receipt No: ACACDC-31923970 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Valassis Direct Mail, Inc.. (Attorney Glenn L. Briggs added to party Valassis Direct Mail, Inc.(pty:dft))(Briggs, Glenn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
