Jessenia Gonzalez De Vidal v. Ford Motor Company et al
| JESSENIA GONZALEZ DE VIDAL, BILLY H VIDAL and Billy H. Vidal |
| FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv07115 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 35
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: On January 24, 2023, Plaintiffs Jessenia Gonzalez de Vidal and Billy H Vidal and Defendant Ford Motor Company filed a Joint Motion for Dismissal, requesting the court dismiss the action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) #34 . Having considered the Motion and finding good cause therefor, the court hereby ORDERS: All dates and deadlines governing this action are VACATED. The court DISMISSES the action with prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
|
Filing 34
Corrected STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Settlement filed by Plaintiffs Jessenia Gonzalez De Vidal, Billy H. Vidal. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rivero, Diana)
|
|
Filing 33
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER STRIKING STIPULATION (DKT. #32 ) by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court STRIKES the parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice for failure to attest on the signature page of the document that all other signatories listed, who electronically signed with a "s" and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the content of and have authorized the filing. See Local Rule 5-4.3.4. Any renewed stipulation must comply with all applicable statutes and Local Rules. Failure to comply with all applicable statutes and Local Rules in any renewed stipulation, including Local Rule 5-4.3.4, may result in the denial of the stipulation with prejudice. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 32
(STRICKEN ON JANUARY 24, 2023; SEE CM/ECF NO. 33) STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Settlement filed by Plaintiffs Jessenia Gonzalez De Vidal, Billy H. Vidal. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rivero, Diana) Modified on 1/24/2023 (tf).
|
|
Filing 31
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: Denying #11 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court. The court finds Defendant has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, and the parties are of diverse citizenship. Jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. Section 1332. For the foregoing reasons, the court DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Dkt. 11). [See Order for further details.] (es)
|
|
Filing 30
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Diana America Rivero counsel for Plaintiff Jessenia Gonzalez De Vidal. Rodney Gi is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff JESSENIA GONZALEZ DE VIDAL. (Rivero, Diana)
|
|
Filing 29
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Diana America Rivero counsel for Plaintiff Jessenia Gonzalez De Vidal. Benjeman Beck is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff JESSENIA GONZALEZ DE VIDAL. (Rivero, Diana)
|
|
Filing 28
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: On January 24, 2022, the court vacated the Scheduling Conference set for January 28, 2022. (Dkt. 24 ). Accordingly, the court DENIES the Amended Joint Motion to Continue the January 28, 2022 Scheduling Conference (Dkt. #23 ) as moot.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 27
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Continue January 28, 2022 Scheduling Conference from 01-28-2022 to February 2022 Re: Stipulation to Continue #21 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Amend Stipulation to Continue #21 January 28, 2022 Scheduling Conference Due to Unavailability of Counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company; Declaration of Judd a. Gilefsky; Declaration of Karyn L. Ihara; Attorney A #23 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Stipulation: Continue or Stipulation: Order. Filer instead of Using "stipulation" used Motion, but erroneously set hearing on Judge's calendar for 1/28/2001 1PM; and Missing proposed order which should have been submitted as a separate attachment (previous "joint motion and its proposed order were stricken). In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
|
|
Filing 26
ORDER RE: SCHEDULE OF PRETRIAL AND TRIAL DATES, TRIAL REQUIREMENTS, AND CONDUCT OF ATTORNEYS AND PARTIES by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/14/2023 01:00 PM ; Jury Trial set for 5/2/2023 08:30 AM ; Motion in Limine set for hearing on 4/14/2023 at 01:00 AM (SEE DOCUMENT FOR ALL SPECIFIED DEADLINES). (lc)
|
|
Filing 25
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 03/10/2023. (tf)
|
|
Filing 24
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: On the court's own motion, the Scheduling Conference currently set for hearing on January 28, 2022, is hereby VACATED. No appearances are necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 23
Amended NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Continue January 28, 2022 Scheduling Conference from 01-28-2022 to February 2022 Re: Stipulation to Continue #21 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Amend Stipulation to Continue #21 January 28, 2022 Scheduling Conference Due to Unavailability of Counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company; Declaration of Judd a. Gilefsky; Declaration of Karyn L. Ihara; Attorney Attestation (L.r. 5-4.3.4) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Motion set for hearing on 1/28/2001 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Ihara, Karyn)
|
|
Filing 22
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER STRIKING STIPULATION (DKT. #21 ) by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The court STRIKES the parties' Joint Motion to Continue Scheduling Conference Due to Unavailability of Counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company for failure to attest on the signature page of the document that all other signatories listed, who electronically signed with a "s" and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the content of and have authorized the filing. See Local Rule 5-4.3.4. Any renewed stipulation must comply with all applicable statutes and Local Rules. Failure to comply with all applicable statutes and Local Rules in any renewed stipulation, including Local Rule 5-4.3.4, may result in the denial of the stipulation with prejudice. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 21
Joint STIPULATION to Continue SCHEDULING CONFERENCE from JANUARY 28, 2022 to LATE FEBRUARY 2022 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.(Ihara, Karyn)
|
|
Filing 20
Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Karyn L Ihara counsel for Defendant Ford Motor Company. Adding Karyn L. Ihara as counsel of record for Defendant Ford Motor Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attorney Karyn L Ihara added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Ihara, Karyn)
|
|
Filing 19
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiffs Jessenia Gonzalez De Vidal, Billy H. Vidal.. (Rivero, Diana)
|
|
Filing 18
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION(S) TO REMAND CASE (DKT. #11 ), (DKT. #13 ) UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha: The Court finds that the Motions to Remand Case currently scheduled for hearing on December 3, 2021, at 1:30 p.m. are appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. L.R. 7-15. Accordingly, these motions are taken UNDER SUBMISSION and the hearing is vacated. No appearances are necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tf)
|
|
Filing 17
NOTICE OF LODGING filed Plaintiffs' Amended Proposed Order re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand [Dkt. #11])(Rivero, Diana)
|
|
Filing 16
RESPONSE IN SUPPORT of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Plaintiffs Jessenia Gonzalez De Vidal, Billy H. Vidal. (Rivero, Diana)
|
|
Filing 15
Oppositioin re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(Hughes, Samantha)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. Scheduling Conference set for 1/28/2022 at 01:00 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (vv)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE OF MOTION re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Plaintiffs Jessenia Gonzalez De Vidal, Billy H. Vidal. Motion set for hearing on 12/3/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Rivero, Diana)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Incorrect document is attached to the docket entry. Main document is ONLY the memorandum in support...MISSING formal notice of Motion with required LR 6.1 information re hearing date, time, Judge and courtroom and Court address, information Other error(s) with document(s): As an alternative, prepare and efile a FORMAL " Notice of Motion" only with required LR 6.1 information. Docket ONLY under its specific event "Notice of Motion"; Link to no. 11. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Jessenia Gonzalez De Vidal. Motion set for hearing on 12/3/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Order) (Rivero, Diana)
|
|
Filing 10
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha. (vv)
|
|
Filing 9
CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Hughes, Samantha)
|
|
Filing 8
Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car)
|
|
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Ford Motor Company, Does 1 through 50, inclusive. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiffs Jessenia Gonzalez De Vidal, Billy H. Vidal. Filed in State Court on 7/30/2021 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car)
|
|
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Filed in State Court on 8/30/2021 Submitted with Attachment 1 Exhibit A to Notice of Filing State Court Answer #4 (car)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY (Hughes, Samantha)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF FILING STATE COURT ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT BY DEFENDANT FORD MOTOR COMPANY; AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Hughes, Samantha)
|
|
Filing 3
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY (Hughes, Samantha)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY. (Hughes, Samantha)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 20STCV36096 Receipt No: ACACDC-31924544 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY, BILLY H VIDAL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Declaration OF SAMANTHA J. HUGHES) (Attorney Samantha Joy Hughes added to party FORD MOTOR COMPANY(pty:dft))(Hughes, Samantha)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
