Arturo Aceves Jimenez v. City of Los Angeles, et al
Arturo Aceves Jimenez |
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Patricia Guerra, George Lou Leiker, Sal LaBarbera, Dominick Fuentes and Does 1-10, inclusive |
2:2021cv07117 |
September 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, Dominick Fuentes, Patricia Guerra, Sal LaBarbera, George Lou Leiker. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (Attachments: #1 CV11C) (esa) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Arturo Aceves Jimenez, (Weisberg, Caitlin) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Arturo Aceves Jimenez. (Weisberg, Caitlin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Arturo Aceves Jimenez. (Weisberg, Caitlin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31924320 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff Arturo Aceves Jimenez. (Attorney Caitlin S. Weisberg added to party Arturo Aceves Jimenez(pty:pla))(Weisberg, Caitlin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.