Gilbert A. Torres v. D. Avalos et al
Gilbert A. Torres |
D. Avalos, Miranda, H. Moseley, Dr. Swaby Alphonso, Dr. Gian Hernandez, Dr. Mario Nawaz, Brooks, D. Valmonte, C. Campall, B. Chavarria, I. Jaruegui, A. Ramos, V. Martinez, J. Bravo, S. Plascious, J. Morales, J. Hernandez, Y. Sanchez, Z. Neblett, G. Johonson, R. Johnson and D. Lewis |
2:2021cv07190 |
September 7, 2021 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Josephine L Staton |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 LETTER from Plaintiff Gilbert A. Torres (hr) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM filed by Plaintiff Gilbert A. Torres.(hr) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, ORDERING Civil Rights Complaint submitted by Plaintiff Gilbert A. Torres, received on 9/9/21, is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Duplicate Filing of Civil Rights Complaint (Dkt. No. 1). (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (hr) |
Filing 6 Notice of Deficiency. On 9/7/2021, the Court received, through the United States Mail, a complaint arising under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Please be advised that the Court and California State Prison, Los Angeles County (LAC) are participants in a pilot project that requires all such documents to be scanned and submitted to the Court by electronic mail, General Order No. 18-02. Submission of this complaint by U.S. Mail violates the terms of General Order 18-02. To submit a complaint arising under 42 U.S.C. 1983 to the Court for filing, you must present it to designated LAC staff for scanning and emailing to the Court. If you are unable to comply with these procedures, you must submit with your complaint a motion for leave to file your documents by U.S. Mail that demonstrates good cause for your inability to submit your documents to the Court electronically. You must now re-submit your complaint to the Court electronically. You must submit for scanning an exact copy of the complaint you previously mailed to the Court; it cannot be modified in any way. You must include this notice on top of the complaint submitted for scanning. If your complaint is received in the Court's electronic mail box within two weeks from the date of this letter, your complaint will be deemed filed as of the date that appears on the envelope you originally sent via U.S. Mail. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (lh) |
Filing 4 REQUEST Asking Court to Accept this TRO with as I file the 1983 Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Gilbert A. Torres. (lh) |
Filing 3 MOTION for a Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminary Injunction, filed by Plaintiff Gilbert A. Torres. (lh) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Gilbert A. Torres. (lh) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Swaby Alphonso(Yard Doctor, official capacity), Swaby Alphonso(Yard Doctor, individual), D. Avalos(Correctional Officer, individual), D. Avalos(Correctional Officer, official capacity), J. Bravo(Correctional Officer (A) Sergeant, individual), J. Bravo(Correctional Officer (A) Sergeant, official capacity), Brooks(Resignation Nurse, individual), Brooks(Resignation Nurse, official capacity), C. Campall(Sergeant Correctional, individual), C. Campall(Sergeant Correctional, official capacity), B. Chavarria(Correctional Officer, official capacity), B. Chavarria(Correctional Officer, individual), Gian Hernandez(on call Doctor, individual), Gian Hernandez(on call Doctor, official capacity), J. Hernandez(Correctional Sergeant, official capacity), J. Hernandez(Correctional Sergeant, individual), I. Jaruegui(Floor Officer Correctional, individual), I. Jaruegui(Floor Officer Correctional, official capacity), R. Johnson(Warden, individual), R. Johnson(Warden, official capacity), G. Johonson(Lieutenant, individual), G. Johonson(Lieutenant, official capacity), D. Lewis(Correctional Officer, individual), D. Lewis(Correctional Officer, official capacity), V. Martinez(Correctional Officer, individual), V. Martinez(Correctional Officer, official capacity), Miranda(Correctional Officer Yard Officer, individual), Miranda(Correctional Officer Yard Officer, official capacity), J. Morales(Correctional Officer, official capacity), J. Morales(Correctional Officer, individual), H. Moseley(Director Third Level Appeal Coordinator, official capacity), H. Moseley(Director Third Level Appeal Coordinator, individual), Mario Nawaz(Yard Doctor, official capacity), Mario Nawaz(Yard Doctor, individual), Z. Neblett(Captain Correction Officer, official capacity), Z. Neblett(Captain Correction Officer, individual), S. Plascious(Correctional Officer, individual), S. Plascious(Correctional Officer, official capacity), A. Ramos(Tower Correctional Officer, official capacity), A. Ramos(Tower Correctional Officer, individual), Y. Sanchez(Correctional Sergeant, individual), Y. Sanchez(Correctional Sergeant, official capacity), D. Valmonte(Record Analyst Case Assigned, official capacity), D. Valmonte(Record Analyst Case Assigned, individual) pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Filed by Plaintiff Gilbert A. Torres. (Attachments: #1 Part 2 of 2 to Complaint) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.