David Loaiza v. Associated Production Music LLC et al
| David Loaiza |
| Associated Production Music LLC and Does 1 to 10, inclusive |
| 2:2021cv07260 |
| September 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| John F Walter |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for December 6, 2021 at 1:15 p.m. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before November 22, 2021. The title page of the Joint Report must state the date and time of the Scheduling Conference. See attached minute order for details. (lom)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Associated Production Music LLC, (Moralyan, Emma) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. Counsel must comply with L.R 7.1-1. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 and Affirmative Defenses filed by Defendant Associated Production Music LLC.(Attorney Emma Moralyan added to party Associated Production Music LLC(pty:dft))(Moralyan, Emma) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff David Loaiza, upon Defendant Associated Production Music LLC served on 9/22/2021, answer due 10/13/2021. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jessie Gastelum, Person Authorized to Accept in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 10 DECLARATION of Thiago M. Coelho of Lead Trial Counsel filed by Plaintiff David Loaiza. (Coelho, Thiago) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Associated Production Music LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff David Loaiza. (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff David Loaiza, (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff David Loaiza. (Coelho, Thiago) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-31959158 - Fee: $402, filed by Plaintiff David Loaiza. (Attorney Thiago Merlini Coelho added to party David Loaiza(pty:pla))(Coelho, Thiago) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
