Marcus R. Ellington v. California Dept of Corr. and Rehab. et al
Plaintiff: Marcus R. Ellington, Sr.
Defendant: California Dept of Corr. and Rehab., Lancaster State Prisons Religious Review Committee, T. Lewandowski, I, E. Lake, D. Ulstad, T. Lee, Does individual and Does Religious Review Committee Members, official capacity
Case Number: 2:2021cv07364
Filed: September 13, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Referring Judge: Consuelo B Marshall
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: granting #10 REQUEST for Extension of Time to File. Plaintiff shall have up to and including December 20, 2021 to file a First Amended Complaint. (see document for further details) (hr)
November 1, 2021 Filing 10 REQUEST for Extension of Time to File an Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Marcus R. Ellington, Sr.(hr)
October 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 . IT IS ORDERED THAT within twenty-one (21) days of the service date of this Order, Plaintiff choose one of the following three options: 1. Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint to attempt to cure the deficiencies discussed above. (see document for further details). (hr)
September 30, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Having Supplied the Court with Payment of $402.00 for the Payment of the Filing Fee for the Instant Case and Cause filed by Plaintiff Marcus R. Ellington, Sr.(hr)
September 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL CIVIL RIGHTS CASE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (see document for details) (hr)
September 23, 2021 Filing 6 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $402.00 from Marcus R. Ellington. Re: Order, #5 . Receipt number LA228294. (Lee, David)
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re: Failure to File Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this lawsuit, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, he must (1) pay the full $402.00 filing fee; (2) file a request for in forma pauperis status; or (3) show cause in writing why he is unable to do so. (see document for further details) (hr)
September 16, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (ghap)
September 14, 2021 Filing 3 Notice of Deficiency. On 9/13/2021, the Court received, through the United States Mail, a complaint arising under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Please be advised that the Court and California State Prison, Los Angeles County (LAC) are participants in a pilot project that requires all such documents to be scanned and submitted to the Court by electronic mail, General Order No. 18-02. Submission of this complaint by U.S. Mail violates the terms of General Order 18-02. To submit a complaint arising under 42 U.S.C. 1983 to the Court for filing, you must present it to designated LAC staff for scanning and emailing to the Court. If you are unable to comply with these procedures, you must submit with your complaint a motion for leave to file your documents by U.S. Mail that demonstrates good cause for your inability to submit your documents to the Court electronically. You must now re-submit your complaint to the Court electronically. You must submit for scanning an exact copy of the complaint you previously mailed to the Court; it cannot be modified in any way. You must include this notice on top of the complaint submitted for scanning. If your complaint is received in the Court's electronic mail box within two weeks from the date of this letter, your complaint will be deemed filed as of the date that appears on the envelope you originally sent via U.S. Mail. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (ghap)
September 14, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93). (ghap)
September 13, 2021 Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants California Dept of Corr. and Rehab., Does(individual), Does(Religious Review Committee Members, official capacity), E. Lake(individual), E. Lake(Community Resource Manager, official capacity), Lancaster State Prisons Religious Review Committee, T. Lee(Captain, Appeal Examiner, official capacity), T. Lee(individual), T. Lewandowski, I(individual), T. Lewandowski, I(Associate warden, Business Services, official capacity), D. Ulstad(Chief Deputy Warden CDW acting (A), official capacity), D. Ulstad(individual) pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kato., filed by plaintiff Marcus R. Ellington, Sr. (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marcus R. Ellington v. California Dept of Corr. and Rehab. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcus R. Ellington, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Dept of Corr. and Rehab.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lancaster State Prisons Religious Review Committee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Lewandowski, I
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. Lake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. Ulstad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does individual
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does Religious Review Committee Members, official capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?