Cymeyon V. Hill v. Kathleen Allison et al
| Cymeyon V. Hill |
| Kathleen Allison, Jeff Lynch, Kimberly Siekiel and Jenneffer Weaver |
| 2:2021cv07368 |
| September 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Josephine L Staton |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Josephine L. Staton that the request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 is hereby DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDED by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick for the following reasons: (1) Legally and/or factually patently frivolous. See attachment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (lh) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner, filed by Plaintiff Cymeyon V. Hill. (lh) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Kathleen Allison, Jeff Lynch, Kimberly Siekiel, Jenneffer Weaver pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. Filed by Plaintiff Cymeyon V. Hill. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
