Gusatvo Banuelos et al v. Armstrong Flooring, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Gustavo Banuelos, Fernando Izarraraz, individually and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated and Fernando Izarraraz
Defendant: Armstrong Flooring, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, Does 1 through 50, inclusive and Armstrong Flooring, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv07393
Filed: September 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Philip S Gutierrez
Referring Judge: Steve Kim
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(A)(1)A(ii) by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. This lawsuit is hereby ORDERED DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE ASTO THE INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFFS BANUELOS AND IZARRARAZ. This lawsuit is hereby ORDERED DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO THE CLAIMS OF THE PUTATIVE CLASS. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
November 8, 2021 Filing 20 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case filed by Plaintiffs Gustavo Banuelos, Fernando Izarraraz. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order of Dismissal Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(A)(1)A(ii))(Greenwald, Randolph)
November 8, 2021 Filing 19 PLAINTIFFS GUSTAVO BANUELOS AND FERNANDO IZARRARAZ'S CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by PLAINTIFFS Gustavo Banuelos, Fernando Izarraraz, (Greenwald, Randolph)
November 8, 2021 Filing 18 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Randolph David Greenwald counsel for Plaintiffs Gustavo Banuelos, Fernando Izarraraz. Adding Randolph Greenwald as counsel of record for PLAINTIFFS GUSTAVO BANUELOS AND FERNANDO IZARRARAZ for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by PLAINTIFFS GUSTAVO BANUELOS, FERNANDO IZARRARAZ. (Attorney Randolph David Greenwald added to party Gustavo Banuelos(pty:pla), Attorney Randolph David Greenwald added to party Fernando Izarraraz(pty:pla))(Greenwald, Randolph)
September 27, 2021 Filing 17 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Reed L. Russell on behalf of Defendant Armstrong Flooring, Inc.. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case. (lt)
September 23, 2021 Filing 16 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Defendant Armstrong Flooring, Inc.. as to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Conformed Copy of Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint)(Land, Jolee)
September 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 11/19/2021 at 02:00 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (jgr)
September 20, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
September 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 21-01-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:20-cv-02627 PSG(SKx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue and Judge Dale S. Fischer to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2L21-cv-07393 PSG(SKx). Signed by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez (rn)
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. The Joint Report must include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial dates. Lead trial counsel are ordered to appear in person unless counsel have been excused by the Court. Scheduling Conference set for 11/1/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale S. Fischer. (rfi)
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
September 16, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Reed L. Russell on behalf on Defendant. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (ghap)
September 16, 2021 Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap)
September 16, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
September 16, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (ghap)
September 16, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE filed by Defendant Armstrong Flooring, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation. Notice of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings (Land, Jolee)
September 16, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Armstrong Flooring, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation. Related Case(s): 2:20-cv-02627 PSG (Land, Jolee)
September 16, 2021 Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Armstrong Flooring, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (Land, Jolee)
September 16, 2021 Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Armstrong Flooring, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, identifying Gustavo Banuelos, Fernando Izarraraz, Armstrong Flooring, Inc.. (Land, Jolee)
September 15, 2021 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Armstrong Flooring, Inc., Does 1 through 100, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Gustavo Banuelos, Fernando Izarraraz. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 7/22/2021 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1-A) (ghap)
September 15, 2021 NON CONFORM COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Defendant Armstrong Flooring, Inc. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1-B)(ghap)
September 15, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Armstrong Flooring, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation. (Land, Jolee)
September 15, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 21STCV26905 Receipt No: ACACDC-31990368 - Fee: $402, filed by Defendant Armstrong Flooring, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Jolee Land, #2 Exhibit 2 - Form 10K, #3 Class Action Complaint For Damages, #4 Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint) (Attorney Jolee Land added to party Armstrong Flooring, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation(pty:dft))(Land, Jolee)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gusatvo Banuelos et al v. Armstrong Flooring, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gustavo Banuelos
Represented By: Edwin Aiwazian
Represented By: Randolph David Greenwald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fernando Izarraraz, individually and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fernando Izarraraz
Represented By: Edwin Aiwazian
Represented By: Randolph David Greenwald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Armstrong Flooring, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation
Represented By: Jolee Land
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Armstrong Flooring, Inc.
Represented By: Jolee Land
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?